Mask Required?

[PRESLEY]

Just now, butlers said:

I would not like to enrage any daily mail readers on the thread.

 

I stated choice, you either want to wear a mask or you don't,   it will be a personal decision,  pick the bones out of that. 

[tinfoilhat]

1 minute ago, PRESLEY said:

I stated choice, you either want to wear a mask or you don't,   it will be a personal decision,  pick the bones out of that. 

I don't think butler was singling you out, you were just the post above. 

[PRESLEY]

6 minutes ago, tinfoilhat said:

Do good. If somebody is a do gooder - they try to do good. And that's an insult.

  What are people getting their knickers in a twist for?  I was just stating it will come down to personal choice after the 19th of this month.

[tinfoilhat]

19 minutes ago, PRESLEY said:

  What are people getting their knickers in a twist for?  I was just stating it will come down to personal choice after the 19th of this month.

Not disagreeing. But people on both sides getting wound up. 

[PRESLEY]

8 minutes ago, tinfoilhat said:

Not disagreeing. But people on both sides getting wound up. 

 Cheers Tinfoil,  I see what you mean. 

[Guest makapaka]

3 hours ago, The_DADDY said:

Hey, I'm not judging. If you want to get jabbed and wear a mask for a virus with a 99%+ survival rate then that's up to you. 👍

That sounds reassuring til you realise how many people are getting it - and how quick.

 

like for example - that statement you made there would mean 280 people that got the virus today are gonna die.

 

99% sounds good when there’s also a low risk of you getting in the first place - but there isnt.

[The_DADDY]

1 hour ago, butlers said:

Virtue signaling belongs a to the same mindless trope as do gooder.

 

And we all know what sort of person uses that

 

Do we? 

I must have missed that memo. Can you explain what you mean please? 

[The_DADDY]

10 minutes ago, makapaka said:

That sounds reassuring til you realise how many people are getting it - and how quick.

 

like for example - that statement you made there would mean 280 people that got the virus today are gonna die.

 

99% sounds good when there’s also a low risk of you getting in the first place - but there isnt.

I disagree. I think there is a miniscule chance of getting it (anecdotally, I know of 2 people who have had it since the charade began. Plenty have tested + but that's likely many false + mixed with a few genuine and no one I know, have met, am related to, have worked with etc etc have died) and an even more miniscule chance of dying from it. 

My only real worry is the increasing numbers of Injuries and deaths from the "vaccine" that the main stream media just don't want to report on. 

[Guest makapaka]

22 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

I disagree. I think there is a miniscule chance of getting it (anecdotally, I know of 2 people who have had it since the charade began. Plenty have tested + but that's likely many false + mixed with a few genuine and no one I know, have met, am related to, have worked with etc etc have died) and an even more miniscule chance of dying from it. 

My only real worry is the increasing numbers of Injuries and deaths from the "vaccine" that the main stream media just don't want to report on. 

I know 6 in the last week. Scores since it started.
 

Don’t make assumptions based on your own experience - there’s over 200000 people a week getting it at the moment.

 

 

 

 

[The_DADDY]

1 minute ago, makapaka said:

I know 6 in the last week. Scores since it started.
 

Don’t make assumptions based on your own experience - there’s over 200000 people a week getting it at the moment.

 

 

 

 

If you believe the official figures. 

I don't.