SheffieldBricky Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Some big names on the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Why is she the only one in the "pokey" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carbuncle Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, hackey lad said: Why is she the only one in the "pokey" She is charged with crimes. Sheffield Bricky's legal filing is not for her criminal case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 3 minutes ago, hackey lad said: Why is she the only one in the "pokey" I dunno. There is some big names on there. I wonder if that's why Kanye and Kim split. 100s of John and Jane Does as well. The mind boggles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 1 minute ago, Carbuncle said: She is charged with crimes. Sheffield Bricky's legal filing is not for her criminal case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 1 minute ago, Carbuncle said: She is charged with crimes. Sheffield Bricky's legal filing is not for her criminal case. What does the John Doe one mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 1 minute ago, SheffieldBricky said: What does the John Doe one mean? I think John /Jane Doe means they cannot be named or dont know who they are . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 Just now, hackey lad said: I think John /Jane Doe means they cannot be named or dont know who they are . I thought that but wondered why not. I got it from twitter and someone said it's because they may be involved with the other legal case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 That's not from the current Maxwell case. It's apparently from a case that was dismissed over a year ago as frivolous: "Plaintiff’s claims rise to the level of the irrational, and there is no legal theory on which she can rely." From here. Most big names in that list were named in the dismissal too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffieldBricky Posted November 22, 2021 Author Share Posted November 22, 2021 16 hours ago, Hecate said: That's not from the current Maxwell case. It's apparently from a case that was dismissed over a year ago as frivolous: "Plaintiff’s claims rise to the level of the irrational, and there is no legal theory on which she can rely." From here. Most big names in that list were named in the dismissal too. Blimey, even great intellects, like what I am, can be fooled. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now