Jump to content

Man Escapes Jail After Assaulting 12 Year Old Girl He Met On Tinder


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, steve68 said:

Snipped 


Also you mentioned about sentencing, even if the guy was genuinely unaware of her age, the fact that sex took place with her, means its a criminal offence, in this case it's Rape of  a child...there isn't any leeway in Law, that's why he has had that sentence,

Snipped 

I had a feeling that may be the case. Still seems strange though if the law recognises he "was tricked" but still see fit to punish him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The_DADDY said:

I had a feeling that may be the case. Still seems strange though if the law recognises he "was tricked" but still see fit to punish him? 

it's odd, but the one thing that can't be changed is the fact she is a child.

also how much time had he been on remand, it might just have be used as the time served.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steve68 said:

it's odd, but the one thing that can't be changed is the fact she is a child.

also how much time had he been on remand, it might just have be used as the time served.

It's was a number of months. 7 I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

I had a feeling that may be the case. Still seems strange though if the law recognises he "was tricked" but still see fit to punish him? 

I think that the Daily Mail have conveniently left out that the conviction was probably for 'Statutory rape'

 

Which is vastly different from sexual assault rape

 

A 16 year old boy can be convicted of Statutory rape for having sex with his 15 year old girlfriend if the parents want to file charges

 

However, in this case the man in question was 20 years old and the girl was 12 years old so he got off lightly if you ask me

Edited by Jack Grey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jack Grey said:

I think that the Daily Mail have conveniently left out that the conviction was probably for 'Statutory rape'

 

Which is vastly different from sexual assault rape

 

A 16 year old boy can be convicted of Statutory rape for having sex with his 15 year old girlfriend if the parents want to file charges

 

However, the man in question was 20 years old

Yeah that's making it difficult for me to get my head around..  The article says he's immature for his age. Perhaps by that they mean his mental and physical ages don't match in which case it would be easier for me to understand but if that was the case surely they would have mentioned it?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steve68 said:

So which one be  Jack referring to? South Park or the other The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a pedophilia and pederasty (courtesy of google)

 

 

Given the context of this thread

 

 

 

Think you misunderstood me. There is an episode of South Park where Cartman joins NAMBLA. Its very amusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.