Jump to content

Kier Starmer & Jimmy Saville


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ads36 said:

i'd bet that he's very pleased with himself.

Liar Boris is trying to be the British Trump.  Just wait till he starts coating on the ronseal

2 hours ago, SheffieldBricky said:

 

It's true what Boris said. Whether he should have said it in parliament is another matter. I support him in this. After a sustained attack about a birthday cake he's right to fight back. 

Have you got your train ticket booked and your slot in the Boris asslicking rota? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SheffieldBricky said:

 

It's true what Boris said. Whether he should have said it in parliament is another matter. I support him in this. After a sustained attack about a birthday cake he's right to fight back. 

No it wasn't.

Can you provide some substantiation to your allegation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, crookesey said:

Savile would love this, dead for over ten years and still the star of the show. :loopy:

Therasa May was the Home Secretary after the 2010 election, why didnt she get Saville done?

Blaming Starmer is just Johnson attacking Labour.

Edited by El Cid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, El Cid said:

Therasa May was the Home Secretary after the 2010 election, why didnt she get Saville done?

Blaming Starmer is just Johnson attacking Labour.

Since when exactly does the Home Secretary conduct investigations and prosecute?  The CPS and attorney-general might have something to say about that.

 

I think we all know the outcome when any suspicions about government influence on PACE or judicial process arises.   The newspapers and appeal courts would be all over it like a rash.

 

It was not an attack on labour. It was a below the  belt jibe during heated argument between the leaders. Starmer was throwing mud and Boris threw some back.  Both examples whichever side you are on displayed failures of leadership followed public apologies. Both examples whichever side you are on displayed personal attacks on the leader rather than the real issue of far deeper failures within both organisations. Both examples whichever side you are on displayed elements of hypocritical behaviour. Both examples whichever side you are on demonstrate clearly why this constant adversarial position and over simplistic tribal support for party colours is in no-one's benefit.

 

31 minutes ago, gamezone07 said:

Why do so many working class voters support Johnson(not Boris.) do you really think he cares about them.

Probably about as much as any other politician. Is the policies you sell and the personality of delivery that wins votes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, alchresearch said:

Momentum and Piers Corbyn stirring up the crowd beforehand?

 

6 hours ago, SheffieldBricky said:

 

It's true what Boris said. Whether he should have said it in parliament is another matter. I support him in this. After a sustained attack about a birthday cake he's right to fight back. 

 

 

1 hour ago, ECCOnoob said:

Since when exactly does the Home Secretary conduct investigations and prosecute?  The CPS and attorney-general might have something to say about that.

 

I think we all know the outcome when any suspicions about government influence on PACE or judicial process arises.   The newspapers and appeal courts would be all over it like a rash.

 

It was not an attack on labour. It was a below the  belt jibe during heated argument between the leaders. Starmer was throwing mud and Boris threw some back.  Both examples whichever side you are on displayed failures of leadership followed public apologies. Both examples whichever side you are on displayed personal attacks on the leader rather than the real issue of far deeper failures within both organisations. Both examples whichever side you are on displayed elements of hypocritical behaviour. Both examples whichever side you are on demonstrate clearly why this constant adversarial position and over simplistic tribal support for party colours is in no-one's benefit.

 

Probably about as much as any other politician. Is the policies you sell and the personality of delivery that wins votes.

 

The standard of trolling on here is very mediocre these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.