Cade Foster Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 (edited) Starmer wasn't the reviewing lawyer, however it would be more correct to say that Whilst Starmer was in charge they failed to prosecute. But it is whataboutery Edited February 1, 2022 by Cade Foster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ads36 Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 (edited) From Nazir Afzal - yesterday : @nazirafzal Reference to Jimmy Savile by Boris Johnson was a disgrace to Parliament & office of Prime Minister ITS NOT TRUE I was there, Keir Starmer had nothing to do with the decisions taken. On the contrary, He supported me in bringing 100s of child sex abusers to justice Edited February 1, 2022 by ads36 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crookesey Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 FTAO both political parties, fight fair or don’t fight at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 8 minutes ago, crookesey said: FTAO both political parties, fight fair or don’t fight at all. @crookeseyYou've no chance - we're talking politicians here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waldo Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, RollingJ said: @crookeseyYou've no chance - we're talking politicians here. Just sit back, break out the popcorn, enjoy the show! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 9 hours ago, Dromedary said: Fullfact org from 2020 https://fullfact.org/online/keir-starmer-prosecute-jimmy-savile/ you know they dont like factcheckers...because they usually tell them what they believe is wrong Its the usual whataboutary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delbow Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 3 hours ago, Cade Foster said: Starmer wasn't the reviewing lawyer, however it would be more correct to say that Whilst Starmer was in charge they failed to prosecute. But it is whataboutery Also a very, very low blow from Johnson. But then, we wouldn't expect any better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crookesey Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 Saville was an expert at collecting people in high places, be it from politics, business, medicine, religion, armed forces, education etc, I wouldn’t blame Starmer for falling for his ‘charms’, after all Maggie did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJRB Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 12 hours ago, SheffieldBricky said: Very productive thread, two whoppers already I think that most people on here recognise your wacky tendencies on a range of subjects. However the comments were uttered by the Prime Minister which only illustrates his remarkable ability to lurch from one disaster to another. I fear what he is up to in Ukraine today and his postponed conversation with Putin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 24 minutes ago, crookesey said: Saville was an expert at collecting people in high places, be it from politics, business, medicine, religion, armed forces, education etc, I wouldn’t blame Starmer for falling for his ‘charms’, after all Maggie did. When you are Director of Public Prosecutions, you are not in the public eye. I havnt a clue who is in charge now. This is just a pointless thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now