Jump to content

Bbc : Biased Broadcasting Corporation


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Chekhov said:

Rather than answer the question, let's divert attentions shall we ?

Because it was a stupid meaningless question. Empathy is empathy, people are different, some are far more sensitive than others, some aren't sensitive at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
1 hour ago, hackey lad said:

Newsnight  tonight.  Amber Heard v Johnny Depp   trial  result  .  Dumbing down of of a once good news program.  BBC  be ashamed 

Like it or not it is a major story with a significantly high profile and high value court case. It also has wider interest as it is a significant result with a rarity of a defamation case pursued in the US courts actually been successful.  That is quite a legal precedent and change from the norm.  It's also demonstrates a contradiction when compared against similar defamation proceedings brought by Depp in the UK which had a completely opposite judgment.  Something therefore noteworthy and worth analysing.

 

Furthermore, the subject matter of the case arose from domestic abuse allegations and important messages arising from it, particularly the publications of such allegations without merit and the general points of believability of a male victim which is often overlooked by a general biased towards instantly siding with a female accuser.

 

Despite what some people think, is far more than just some celebrity gossip. It's a news program and it's a news story.

Edited by ECCOnoob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

Like it or not it is a major story with a significantly high profile and high value court case. It also has wider interest as it is a significant result with a rarity of a defamation case pursued in the US courts actually been successful.  That is quite a legal precedent and change from the norm.  It's also demonstrates a contradiction when compared against similar defamation proceedings brought by Depp in the UK which had a completely opposite judgment.  Something therefore noteworthy and worth analysing.

 

Furthermore, the subject matter of the case arose from domestic abuse allegations and important messages arising from it, particularly the publications of such allegations without merit and the general points of believability of a male victim which is often overlooked by a general biased towards instantly siding with a female accuser.

 

Despite what some people think, is far more than just some celebrity gossip. It's a news program and it's a news story.

Is it  really a top news  story ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ECCOnoob said:

Like it or not it is a major story with a significantly high profile and high value court case. It also has wider interest as it is a significant result with a rarity of a defamation case pursued in the US courts actually been successful.  That is quite a legal precedent and change from the norm.  It's also demonstrates a contradiction when compared against similar defamation proceedings brought by Depp in the UK which had a completely opposite judgment.  Something therefore noteworthy and worth analysing.

 

Furthermore, the subject matter of the case arose from domestic abuse allegations and important messages arising from it, particularly the publications of such allegations without merit and the general points of believability of a male victim which is often overlooked by a general biased towards instantly siding with a female accuser.

 

Despite what some people think, is far more than just some celebrity gossip. It's a news program and it's a news story.

It belongs on the supermarket tabloids, with Meghan and Harry, Jen and Brad, and all the other screwed up celebs, for those folks who have no lives outside the telly.

 

Could be mentioned in passing by your government funded news organ, but headline news in today's World? Half a dozen stories at the top of their website?

 

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, trastrick said:

It belongs on the supermarket tabloids, with Meghan and Harry, Jen and Brad, and all the other screwed up celebs, for those folks who have no lives outside the telly.

 

Could be mentioned in passing by your government funded news organ, but headline news in today's World? Half a dozen stories at the top of their website?

 

Lol

Well I'm glad you find false allegations of domestic abuse and malicious actions to seek to ruin someone's reputation and career to be amusing.

 

Think what you like, but it was a high-profile high-value court case with massive interest around the globe and several newsworthy elements on both it's wider implications and legal precedent. That's news and it's what a news organisation is supposed to be reporting on.

 

I don't know why you need to make some sly dig  about the BBC being government-funded as it's completely irrelevant.  Besides, given the state of most North American news broadcasts with their hyped up drama, shouty pouty anchors and OTT graphics, forgive me for not taking criticism of the BBC very seriously.

 

Like all news organisations the Editor and Producer select on relevant and recency. Even more so when they are editing down and trimming fat for a highlights programme such as Newsnight.   They will question is anything new occurring in the Russian war of the past 8 hours.... no. Is there any new element to the ongoing saga in the British Parliament over the past 8 hours... no. Is there any other major breaking incident which is going to trump the live verdict in a high profile court case...no. So it's bloody obvious that they are going to pick the freshest and most live happening thing to be top billing with all other ongoing issues or already reported stories to be secondary items on the show.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.