Modern Life Is Rubbish

[cressida]

16 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Eugh 🤮

I remember a time when women had class. Seems those times are on the way out.

Anyone can behave badly but it takes character not to.

[Chekhov]

1 hour ago, Delayed said:

Pity you can't get over things 

Sorry, you obviously got the wrong end of the stick.

This an ongoing problem.

You do not "get over" an ongoing problem.

[RJRB]

34 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Eugh 🤮

I remember a time when women had class. Seems those times are on the way out.

Ah those halcyon days of yesteryear.

[Delayed]

2 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

Sorry, you obviously got the wrong end of the stick.

This an ongoing problem.

You do not "get over" an ongoing problem.

There is no ongoing problem. A school had restrictions, you don’t like them but ended up complying anyway and that’s it.

 

 

[Chekhov]

1 hour ago, Organgrinder said:

This non-authoritarian  leftie told Chekhov, that he has plenty of opportunity to film his kids out of doors, as the parents here have obviously done.  No Problem!

Why should we want to stand in front to stop it ?            Do the safe guarding laws only apply in "Leftie" towns and cities ?     

If you're talking about the safeguarding laws,  why on earth does everything need to be about politics and "lefties" ?

Good to hear you do not think parents should be stopped from videoing their kids.

 

>>safeguarding<<

 

"Safeguarding" does not mean one set of people stopping another set of people doing stuff (which is perfectly normal and very important to them) for a risk that is so low it is not even statistically quantifiable.

 

3 minutes ago, Delayed said:

There is no ongoing problem. A school had restrictions, you don’t like them but ended up complying anyway and that’s it.

You have a very strange grasp of the English language, of course that is an on going problem.

 

It's a pity you weren't at the gala, you could have told all those parents they were out of order taking pics of their kids dancing with their troupe. I'm sure they'd have been "interested" to hear your views.

Edited June 24, 2023 by Chekhov

[Guest]

12 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

Good to hear you do not think parents should be stopped from videoing their kids.

 

>>safeguarding<<

 

"Safeguarding" does not mean one set of people stopping another set of people doing stuff (which is perfectly normal and very important to them) for a risk that is so low it is not even statistically quantifiable.

 

Mess about with the English language as much as you like but,  in the end,  the law still means the same thing so you will have to live with it or get arrested.

 

[Delayed]

15 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

 

You have a very strange grasp of the English language, of course that is an on going problem.

 

It's a pity you weren't at the gala, you could have told all those parents they were out of order taking pics of their kids dancing with their troupe. I'm sure they'd have been "interested" to hear your views.

It’s only an ongoing problem in your head. If it’s an ongoing problem, what is being done about it?

 

I wouldn’t have said anything if I was there because clearly the Gala had no restrictions in place.

[Chekhov]

14 hours ago, Delayed said:

I wouldn’t have said anything if I was there because clearly the Gala had no restrictions in place.

Hold on, can we be consistent please ? 

Weren't you one of those saying kids being videoed was dangerous and therefore any ban was a good thing ?

In fact you, and certainly some others, were saying it wasn't the ban that was unreasonable it was me expecting to be able to video my child.

Surely if you actually think that you should have been "protecting" those kids in all that danger ?

 

In fact steve69 actually made some trolling post implying it was weird to want to video your children, pity he wasn't there telling all those parents his views on it because I'd have liked to see the result. 

[Delayed]

3 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

Hold on, can we be consistent please ? 

Weren't you one of those saying kids being videoed was dangerous and therefore any ban was a good thing ?

In fact you, and certainly some others, were saying it wasn't the ban that was unreasonable it was me expecting to be able to video my child.

Surely if you actually think that you should have been "protecting" those kids in all that danger ?

 

In fact steve69 actually made some trolling post implying it was weird to want to video your children, pity he wasn't there telling all those parents his views on it because I'd have liked to see the result. 

Hold on can we stop making things up to suit your own narrative please?

 

No, I wasn't one those people.

 

My position is and has always been that I can understand any venues restriction on photographing children for the reasons you've stated. If that venue has the restriction on place so be it, I understand why.

 

It doesn't mean that I expect it in every venue. If not, ok fair enough. If so, again fair enough. 

[Chekhov]

9 minutes ago, Delayed said:

Hold on can we stop making things up to suit your own narrative please?

No, I wasn't one those people.

My position is and has always been that I can understand any venues restriction on photographing children for the reasons you've stated. If that venue has the restriction on place so be it, I understand why.

It doesn't mean that I expect it in every venue. If not, ok fair enough. If so, again fair enough. 

Your answer is inconsistent.

Is videoing kids dangerous, or not ?

Yes or no ?