Jump to content

Modern Life Is Rubbish


Recommended Posts

 

  20 minutes ago, Rockers rule said:

'The picture aimed at Allowing adults access to kid’s swimming lessons is a recipe for disaster. Who knows what sort of weirdos would be attracted to a pool in those circumstances'.

 

 

6 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

Why would Paedos want to swim in the same pool as kids having swimming lessons (and separated from them by a rope) more then they would want to swim in the same pool as kids ?
It makes no sense. It is the kind of idea that seems rational, till one actually dissects it.

But, as I have stated before, sooner or later kids will not be able to swim in the same pool as adults unless they can prove they are a parent, it will happen, sooner or later..... The world is literally going paranoid / mad.

Again selective quoting. Bold was Prettytom's post not mine as you well know.

 

I'd re -read your own dribble.

(Why would Paedos want to swim in the same pool as kids having swimming lessons (and separated from them by a rope) more then they would want to swim in the same pool as kids ?
It makes no sense. It is the kind of idea that seems rational, till one actually dissects it
).

 

Dissect away, what possible reasons could there be :huh:.

 

I do like your idea of separating paedo's  with a rope :thumbsup: 

save on prison time 🧐

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Rockers rule said:

  20 minutes ago, Rockers rule said:

'The picture aimed at Allowing adults access to kid’s swimming lessons is a recipe for disaster. Who knows what sort of weirdos would be attracted to a pool in those circumstances'.

Again selective quoting. Bold was Prettytom's post not mine as you well know.

This is too complicated for me, I thought you were using the fact an ex Corn St actor had been accused of child abuse in a pool was a reason why adults should not be able to swim in the same pool as people having swimming lessons.

I answered you with this (which is not dribble BTW, it's indisputable) :

 

Why would Paedos want to swim in the same pool as kids having swimming lessons (and separated from them by a rope) more then they would want to swim in the same pool as kids ?
It makes no sense. It is the kind of idea that seems rational, till one actually dissects it.

 

Your argument is inconsistent unless you want to expand it to include banning all adults swimming in the same pool as kids (which will, I am sure, happen sooner or later). Essentially I am pointing out that, as regards the possibility that a child might be assaulted, it makes no difference if they're having swimming lessons or not. If anything they are much LESS likely to be assaulted by someone (who just happens to be in the same pool as they are) whilst they are having a swimming lesson.

Edited by Chekhov
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is getting ridiculous 

How did the paedophile business creep in to a complaint that kids swimming lessons were over running.

There are rules about kids of 8 and under being accompanied by adults.

There will be attendants there plus other unrelated adults with there own children as well.

Whats the problem other than the management should make sure that the session times are adhered to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chekhov said:

This is too complicated for me, I thought you were using the fact an ex Corn St actor had been accused of child abuse in a pool was a reason why adults should not be able to swim in the same pool as people having swimming lessons.

I answered you with this (which is not dribble BTW, it's indisputable) :

 

Why would Paedos want to swim in the same pool as kids having swimming lessons (and separated from them by a rope) more then they would want to swim in the same pool as kids ?
It makes no sense. It is the kind of idea that seems rational, till one actually dissects it.

 

Your argument is inconsistent unless you want to expand it to include banning all adults swimming in the same pool as kids (which will, I am sure, happen sooner or later). Essentially I am pointing out that, as regards the possibility that a child might be assaulted, it makes no difference if they're having swimming lessons or not. If anything they are much LESS likely to be assaulted by someone (who just happens to be in the same pool as they are) whilst they are having a swimming lesson.

My argument is inconsistent because it's not my argument.

 

Keep 🎣 someone might bite 8) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.