HeHasRisen Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 25 minutes ago, Leo Tomlinson said: Please do not be condescending , I know the situation well , Perhaps the asylum seekers who are being refused entry to our Country would be better citizens than those who are ruining Firth Park and other areas . Why not re house the litter louts and loud music dwellers in areas around the South of our City , Dore , Totley , Ecclesall etc and see what the reaction would be , You can bet the local Councillors , MP's would soon be on the case . Ok, how do you propose these people be rehoused? Under what authority and/or legislation? You clearly dont understand the situation if you think this is actually possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 On 10/06/2022 at 08:50, prince al said: Get the lazy buggers picking their own rubbish up! Issue each one of them PPE, bin liner, and a litter picker. Only them will the penny drop. That's not a bad idea. Get a team out there ready with litter pickers and bags to put it in, ready to hand out to anyone loitering or littering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, HeHasRisen said: Its already been explained to you the status of the people involved. They are NOT asylum seekers. Maybe then, they should be compelled to apply for UK citizenship within say 5 years. And benefits should not be an automatic right until they receive citizenship. To get citizenship they have to complete certain courses of education in being a good citizen, eg learn english both spoken and written, learn English customs and practices, learn about work opportunities, and generally learn how to be a good citizen in this country. Benefits could be stopped or visas not renewed for failure to attend. Failure to achieve and prove good citizen status within 5 years could then result in some penalty, the worst of which would be having to return to their country of origin. Just an idea. Edited June 12, 2022 by Anna B 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 3 hours ago, Anna B said: Maybe then, they should be compelled to apply for UK citizenship within say 5 years. And benefits should not be an automatic right until they receive citizenship. To get citizenship they have to complete certain courses of education in being a good citizen, eg learn english both spoken and written, learn English customs and practices, learn about work opportunities, and generally learn how to be a good citizen in this country. Benefits could be stopped or visas not renewed for failure to attend. Failure to achieve and prove good citizen status within 5 years could then result in some penalty, the worst of which would be having to return to their country of origin. Just an idea. Dont expect any ideas or solutions from that idiot . Just likes spouting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 33 minutes ago, hackey lad said: Dont expect any ideas or solutions from that idiot . Just likes spouting She's just put up some ideas which is more than you have done. You are obviously not here to take part in the debate but just to pull other people down. We need people with answers to questions, not trolls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Organgrinder said: She's just put up some ideas which is more than you have done. You are obviously not here to take part in the debate but just to pull other people down. We need people with answers to questions, not trolls. I was not referring to Anna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 7 hours ago, Leo Tomlinson said: Force ??????Perhaps Rwanda will be a solution as has been championed by some on here . I fully agree. By force if necessary. Just now, hackey lad said: I was not referring to Anna In which case, I apologise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 5 minutes ago, Organgrinder said: I fully agree. By force if necessary. In which case, I apologise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 6 hours ago, Leo Tomlinson said: Please do not be condescending , I know the situation well , Perhaps the asylum seekers who are being refused entry to our Country would be better citizens than those who are ruining Firth Park and other areas . Why not re house the litter louts and loud music dwellers in areas around the South of our City , Dore , Totley , Ecclesall etc and see what the reaction would be , You can bet the local Councillors , MP's would soon be on the case . Because our 'local' MP doesn't live in the area, AFAIK, and neither do more than a couple of the City councillors, I doubt anything would be done, and if the local residents complained, they would just be called 'racist' - or some other derogatory name. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cytine Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 "Why not re house the litter louts and loud music dwellers in areas around the South of our City , Dore , Totley , Ecclesall etc and see what the reaction would be , You can bet the local Councillors , MP's would soon be on the case " I object strongly to paying for these foreign scroungers in to live in places that I can't afford to live. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now