Jump to content

So What Is In His Mini-Budget?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, harvey19 said:

I heard  also that it was a good budget

Who did you hear it from? I’m getting the impression that a few on here have been involved in a seance.

1 minute ago, Dromedary said:

Rayner is Socialist... now that a laugh but I hope and with any luck she will be the last socialist. She was only appointed to where she is because of positive discrimination (all female shortlist) and the backing of the trade unions because she was a Unison branch secretary. Like everyone kept saying about Boris she is toast and needs to go for any chance of Labour ever getting a nose in at the next election.

 

Are you intoxicated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dromedary said:

Rayner is Socialist... now that a laugh but I hope and with any luck she will be the last socialist. She was only appointed to where she is because of positive discrimination (all female shortlist) and the backing of the trade unions because she was a Unison branch secretary. Like everyone kept saying about Boris she is toast and needs to go for any chance of Labour ever getting a nose in at the next election.

 

Starmer has systematically expelled all the Socialists, including Jeremy Corbyn, from a Socialist party. For that, he will never be forgiven. He has split the Labour party thus making it unelectable, when he could have worked with them, United it, and made it a balanced, representative party which would now be storming the polls.

Rayner is there because as deputy leader he was not allowed to get rid of her. She has a big mouth and isn't polished, but she still says it like it is. Corbyn was actually a voice of reason and would have united both sides of the party and  and made it work. He was honest and wise, and all for the good of the country. Starmer on the other hand is two faced, uncommitted, and no match for the machinations of the unscrupulous Tory party.     

Edited by Anna B
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Anna B said:

Starmer has systematically expelled all the Socialists, including Jeremy Corbyn, from a Socialist party. For that, he will never be forgiven. He has split the Labour party thus making it unelectable, when he could have worked with them, United it, and made it a balanced, representative party which would now be storming the polls.

Rayner is there because as deputy leader he was not allowed to get rid of her. She has a big mouth and isn't polished, but she still says it like it is. Corbyn was actually a voice of reason and would have united both sides of the party and  and made it work. He was honest and wise, and all for the good of the country. Starmer on the other hand is a two faced, uncommitted, and no match for the machinations of the unscrupulous Tory party.     

Did you have a look at my post on the Conservative thread listing some points which I would have thought Labour could gain support from. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.