Should There Be A Thread Limit Per Member Per Month?

[Resident]

An anti-spam filter would be prudent but should be limited by:

X amount of new threads within X amount of time, for example if a user created 3 threads within 1 hour/ 5 threads within 2 hours and tries to create a 6th within that 2hr time frame they are denied & suspended from creating new threads for 12 hours.  

X amount of forum replies with X amount of time, for example 20 replies within an hour, 31st is denied and user isn't able to post for 2 hours.  

These are just my personal choices for limits, I think only a true spammer would hit them.

I would also like to see a system where if a user has a post reported by multiple users that the forum hides the post from view & suspends the user from posting until the post has been reviewed and admin/moderators chose what to do. 

I've belonged to and even operated forum(s) that have had anti-spam filters including the last system & I'm sure it's available as an addon for Invision boards

[hackey lad]

1 hour ago, melthebell said:

I think your a ******** and taking what i said the wrong way as usual, i meant the amount of threads you post on controversial subjects just to get a rise from people but post no personal input at all, just a link usually, or a video.

[Padders]

18 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

Would be very nice if you could take the trouble to post a full sentence once in a while 

[hackey lad]

5 minutes ago, Padders said:

Would be very nice if you could take the trouble to post a full sentence once in a while 

Why waste internet space with a long reply, when  will suffice 

[crookesey]

20 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

Why waste internet space with a long reply, when  will suffice 

[The_DADDY]

4 hours ago, melthebell said:

I think your a ******** and taking what i said the wrong way as usual, i meant the amount of threads you post on controversial subjects just to get a rise from people but post no personal input at all, just a link usually, or a video.

There's really no need to be rude and abusive. You could always just ignore the thread?

Maybe you should try that next time.

[RollingJ]

26 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

There's really no need to be rude and abusive. You could always just ignore the thread?

Maybe you should try that next time.

Standard behaviour from a (very small) number of contributors on here - I usually just ignore their childish practice

[The_DADDY]

1 minute ago, RollingJ said:

Standard behaviour from a (very small) number of contributors on here - I usually just ignore their childish practice

True. Some people must be very angry with life to get so worked up like they do. 

[RollingJ]

2 minutes ago, West 77 said:

Yes, and in your case, it should be one thread per month

In your opinion, of course. I don't agree with a lot @The_DADDYposts, but he is entitled to his opinion.

[cressida]

It would be novel if people posted a thread and replies had to be in emojis  (bit more peaceful too,  yet I have noticed that if there is a 'ruck' going on loads of guests suddenly start viewing.