Jump to content

Sheffield Congestion Charge From Feb 27th 2023


Chekhov

Recommended Posts

On 03/02/2023 at 08:31, HeHasRisen said:

The woman on BBC Radio Sheffield yesterday say she had tried relentlessly to get the CAZ cancelled and the government was having none of it, so the bit highlighted in red above is utter bull on your part. Unless you are claiming she was lying?

i am 

Please find Sheffield City Council’s response to your request set out below:

 

Sheffield City Council has not appealed to have the CAZ mandate withdrawn.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sheffbag said:

i am 

Please find Sheffield City Council’s response to your request set out below:

 

Sheffield City Council has not appealed to have the CAZ mandate withdrawn.

Hmmm... :huh:


It's just a thought but...
... what are the legal implications of the details in the FOI reply being lies?

 

How does anyone know that what's in the reply is the truth?

 

From the questions you've asked, it would appear that the easier option would be for SCC to state that they've never appealed, rather than have to go to all the trouble of answering all your other questions.

 

I'd genuinely be interested to know if a FOI reply carries any legal weight, and can someone be prosecuted etc if they provide false information in a reply.

 

Nice work btw! :thumbsup:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your problem is proving it was a lie. And who would you go to in order to prove otherwise. 

 

Returning to whoever did the interview with this info may be a handy starting point.  Was it Toby Foster? 

Edited by HeHasRisen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Your problem is proving it was a lie. And who would you go to in order to prove otherwise. 

 

Returning to whoever did the interview with this info may be a handy starting point.  Was it Toby Foster? 

ive put the link to the interview in the post above my response to you but here you go https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0f0kwfb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Your problem is proving it was a lie. And who would you go to in order to prove otherwise. 

 

Returning to whoever did the interview with this info may be a handy starting point.  Was it Toby Foster? 

Hmmm... :huh:


Well clearly either the councillor OR the person who replied to the FOI request are telling porkies!


And as both are representing SCC...
... that would imply that SCC are lying to the public!


I agree though, get Mr Toby back on the case! :thumbsup:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or, reply to the FOI with another FOI giving link to said interview and the reference number of first FOI, stating the discrepenfy in info, and asking a) which is actually correct, and b) why is there a difference? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Oh and maybe find a way to clip the interview off that website before it mysteriously vanishes.

Doing that in the morning but is available on the sounds site. 
not raising another foi . Just a complaint via the links planner gave

then see what the star thinks of it

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sheffbag said:

Doing that in the morning but is available on the sounds site. 
not raising another foi . Just a complaint via the links planner gave

then see what the star thinks of it

It's only on Sounds for a set period and I have no idea how long that is. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.