HeHasRisen Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 (edited) 1 minute ago, mike1961 said: Irrelevant Yes, your protest ultimately will be. Hopefully they have a few extra parking attendants on duty today to ticket all of the vans that will likely be double parked all over the city centre today. Edited February 4, 2023 by HeHasRisen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHasRisen Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 11 hours ago, Longcol said: I'll be looking out for the banners saying "Ignore Government Regulations - They're Claptrap" and "Bojo Tells The Truth" 😎 You need to throw the obligatory spelling mistake and/or grammatical error in, lest we forget. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike1961 Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 13 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said: You need to throw the obligatory spelling mistake and/or grammatical error in, lest we forget. Have you ever thought you may be wrong,indeed I may be wrong as well but we're all entitled to our opinions and freedom of speech,well at the moment we are anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 15 hours ago, RollingJ said: But the main part of it was rather damning, wouldn't you say? I don’t know enough about it to take a view. As far as I can see you could just as easily say it highlighted some deficiencies in how they kept records and categorised information, which they have now corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackydog Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 19 hours ago, Planner1 said: And the article said: The report added "we have not seen evidence that information was deliberately withheld to avoid publication". Just the usual incompetence then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 1 hour ago, Planner1 said: I don’t know enough about it to take a view. As far as I can see you could just as easily say it highlighted some deficiencies in how they kept records and categorised information, which they have now corrected. Have they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 23 minutes ago, blackydog said: Just the usual incompetence then? Does the report say that? 10 minutes ago, RollingJ said: Have they? Report said so didn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, Planner1 said: Report said so didn't it? Honestly don't know - if it does, and you want to confirm it, would you mind pointing it out? Sorry, I am a little busy, ATM, so yes I could go and read the full report, but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 22 minutes ago, RollingJ said: Honestly don't know - if it does, and you want to confirm it, would you mind pointing it out? Sorry, I am a little busy, ATM, so yes I could go and read the full report, but... The BBC report says: The council said it had improved its record management procedures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted February 4, 2023 Share Posted February 4, 2023 3 minutes ago, Planner1 said: The BBC report says: The council said it had improved its record management procedures. Well, they would wouldn't they? I could say I won £17m on the lottery, but it wouldn't be true. I suppose the test will come of someone makes a similar FoI request in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now