Jump to content

Blades About To Be Sold!


Man in Crete

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, top4718 said:

Speculation, find some more accurate sources.

How is Sky Sports not an accurate source? What would you class as an accurate source? Someone from SUFC Finance Team? Cos I’m sure with your connections you could ask them to confirm. 

Is the £23m speculation for Brewster?  Cos I’m sure you were very vocal about the fee ever since we signed him.

And even if undisclosed fees are paid in instalments, they are still paid transfer fees.  How many teams do you know who pay out fees up front (other than possibly the Big 6). 

Edited by DaMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/12/2022 at 17:58, atticus said:

I forgot that Hashimi didn’t get the gig . You could argue that he/she was ahead of their time though; half the young uns now haven’t got a clue what they are .

They can throw you in jail these days just for saying you’re a man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, top4718 said:

 

 

How many players have you bought for fees in the last three seasons?

According to Transfermarkt (euros):

 

  • Brewster: 26m
  • Ramsdale: 20.5m
  • Burke: 6.5m
  • Bogle: 3.85m
  • Lowe: 3.85
  • Coulibaly: 2m
  • Davies: 300k
  • Ahmedhodzic: 4.5m

 

Thats over 67m

 

How much have you spent on players in the last 3 seasons?

 

And is your dad bigger than my dad?

 

 

1 hour ago, Ridgewalk said:

They can throw you in jail these days just for saying you’re a man

These days? They can throw you in jail? 

 

What happens if you say you're English?

Edited by PapaLazarou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, PapaLazarou said:

According to Transfermarkt (euros):

 

  • Brewster: 26m
  • Ramsdale: 20.5m
  • Burke: 6.5m
  • Bogle: 3.85m
  • Lowe: 3.85
  • Coulibaly: 2m
  • Davies: 300k
  • Ahmedhodzic: 4.5m

 

Thats over 67m

 

How much have you spent on players in the last 3 seasons?

 

 

 

 

Don't mention or ask anything about the team who were deducted points for financial fiddling, you'll be accused of being a **** stirrer amongst other things.

Threats of Admin for unpaid bills.

Don't say anything about that.

They'll end up wanting to talk about the thread topic all of a sudden the best run team in the City and the best football team in the City.

Edited by Alextopman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PapaLazarou said:

According to Transfermarkt (euros):

 

  • Brewster: 26m
  • Ramsdale: 20.5m
  • Burke: 6.5m
  • Bogle: 3.85m
  • Lowe: 3.85
  • Coulibaly: 2m
  • Davies: 300k
  • Ahmedhodzic: 4.5m

 

Thats over 67m

 

How much have you spent on players in the last 3 seasons?

 

And is your dad bigger than my dad?

 

 

These days? They can throw you in jail? 

 

What happens if you say you're English?

Go on …enlighten everyone &  explain what difference does it make how much Wednesday have spent on players over the last 3 seasons? ….

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, PapaLazarou said:

According to Transfermarkt (euros):

 

  • Brewster: 26m
  • Ramsdale: 20.5m
  • Burke: 6.5m
  • Bogle: 3.85m
  • Lowe: 3.85
  • Coulibaly: 2m
  • Davies: 300k
  • Ahmedhodzic: 4.5m

 

Thats over 67m

 

How much have you spent on players in the last 3 seasons?

 

And is your dad bigger than my dad?

 

 

These days? They can throw you in jail? 

 

What happens if you say you're English?

A lot of those figures were undisclosed so speculation, lets say it was £67m for arguments sake, it bought you the worst start to a season in football history, money well spent 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cmonkes said:

Enlighten us on how relevant it is how much United have spent since relegation? Tops is obviously fixated on it and spouts the same nonsense every window, incorrectly....

 

We upon relegation we remained very much in tact. We didn't wholesale sell, we kept a team together who in all fairness did compete at Premier League level. The relegation season was a let down, but the squad was more than good enough to compete in the championship.

 

We have then complimented this with a few loans and signings in areas in which we have lacked depth mainly. We haven't had to go out spending on signings, because in the whole we have pretty much had 2 players for every position. 

 

You dont have to go out and make ridiculous signings to try and fix something that isn't broken at the end of the day..... But obviously bias translates this as apparently skint.... despite spending reasonably on strengthening in the right areas.

 

 

The understatement of the decade.

 

Dress it up how you like he's skint, had to borrow to survive with loan payments based on future Prem money that obviously didn't materialise you've been lucky that it's a weak Championship so you'll save your neck by going up.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, top4718 said:

The understatement of the decade.

 

Dress it up how you like he's skint, had to borrow to survive with loan payments based on future Prem money that obviously didn't materialise you've been lucky that it's a weak Championship so you'll save your neck by going up.

Can someone just clarify this ‘weak Championship’ thing for me? Teams are beating each other week in and week out with not many teams standing out (other than top two) so how does that make it weak if everyone is evenly matched? It’s funny how each year that Blades are in the promotion race that others claim it’s ‘weak’. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.