Nhs Bosses Want Interview Panels To Justify Why They Have Hired A White Person

[Guest makapaka]

1 minute ago, The_DADDY said:

No they are not.

 

Maybe leave off the grown up chat for a while pal.  

[The_DADDY]

3 minutes ago, makapaka said:

Maybe leave off the grown up chat for a while pal.  

Maybe stop ignoring discrimination when it's against white people fella 

[Guest makapaka]

3 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Maybe stop ignoring discrimination when it's against white people fella 

When you can show me where that’s happened.

[fools]

9 minutes ago, makapaka said:

pal.  

Oh no, he's used the P word, be throwing chairs around next. Waffle anyone?

Edited December 29, 2022 by fools

[The_DADDY]

On 26/12/2022 at 10:18, iansheff said:

If the article below is correct, no wonder the NHS  needs a lot of administrators with all the box ticking to justify appointments. A policy at the Royal Free in north London requires staff to compile reports justifying why the successful candidate was deemed ‘more suitable’.  They are forcing interview panels to explain why they have hired a white person over someone from an ethnic minority, but It does not apply the other way around. how can that be allowed to happen, isn't it Racist? The NHS need more frontline staff not faceless bureaucrats with crackpot ideas. A post should go to the person best suited to the job regardless of sex or ethnicity.

 

NHS bosses want interview panels to justify why they have hired a white person (msn.com)

 

 

👆👆👆👆👆

Just now, makapaka said:

When you can show me where that’s happened.

👍

[Tipstaff]

WHY, in 2022 should a panel of managers have to justify WHY they have selected the BEST CANDIDATE for any job REGARDLESS OF RACE, COLOUR, RELIGION, GENDER OR AGE???

[Magilla]

8 hours ago, The_DADDY said:

Maybe stop ignoring discrimination when it's against white people fella 

Your linked article does not show any discrimination against white people, or anyone at all for that matter.

Edited December 29, 2022 by Magilla

[despritdan]

8 hours ago, The_DADDY said:

👆👆👆👆👆

👍

There's absolutely no point in trying to have a rational debate with people who are either wind up merchants or so brainwashed by political correctness, they can't see the wood for the trees. You're absolutely correct in asserting this is discrimination against white people so don't let the woke collective get you down; the best thing to do is just ignore them.

[Guest makapaka]

14 minutes ago, despritdan said:

There's absolutely no point in trying to have a rational debate with people who are either wind up merchants or so brainwashed by political correctness, they can't see the wood for the trees. You're absolutely correct in asserting this is discrimination against white people so don't let the woke collective get you down; the best thing to do is just ignore them.

But no one can explain why it’s discriminatory- because it’s not.

 

So its easier just to call it “woke” a bit like the daily mail does in the opening sentence of their article.

 

you can’t just make assertions without foundation and then call it “woke” when you can’t back it up. 
 

it’s a bit desperate, Dan.

[Magilla]

1 hour ago, despritdan said:

You're absolutely correct in asserting this is discrimination against white people so don't let the woke collective get you down; the best thing to do is just ignore them.

How does it discriminate against white people?

 

 

 

1 hour ago, makapaka said:

But no one can explain why it’s discriminatory.

It's those blindingly simple questions again