Al Bundy Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 On 07/06/2023 at 21:23, Palomar said: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jun/09/how-can-i-help-my-white-friend-understand-his-dating-preferences-are-racist More white bashing from the rag of racism. 🤡🤡🤡 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 hour ago, Al Bundy said: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jun/09/how-can-i-help-my-white-friend-understand-his-dating-preferences-are-racist More white bashing from the rag of racism. 🤡🤡🤡 What a total load of bovine excrement. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Bundy Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 Do they stay up all night trying to think up complete bullshine? https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2023/jun/11/my-sister-made-a-racist-joke-now-we-have-a-family-rift-philippa-perry 🤡🤡🤡 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 13 minutes ago, Al Bundy said: Do they stay up all night trying to think up complete bullshine? https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2023/jun/11/my-sister-made-a-racist-joke-now-we-have-a-family-rift-philippa-perry 🤡🤡🤡 Most probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trastrick Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 The U.S. has its own version of The Guardian, actually quite a few! But leading the pack are The Washington Post and the New York Times. The New York Post Washington throws a pity party for federal censors finally being investigated "Washington Post readers were invited Tuesday to a 1,700-word pity party for federal censorship contractors. Federal agencies have launched crusades in recent years to suppress “disinformation” on the Internet. They mostly rely on “censorship by surrogate” because the First Amendment’s freedom-of-speech provision makes it legally dicey to directly muzzle Americans". "And fearing legal trouble from the feds if they didn’t cooperate, social-media companies kowtowed to the surrogates. "During the 2020 election season, contractors composing the Election Integrity Project filed endless objections to Americans’ online posts with social-media firms. "The project spurred crackdowns that affected “millions of individual Facebook posts, YouTube videos, TikToks, and tweets” thanks to “huge regulatory pressure from government,” according to former State Department official Mike Benz. The WaPo lauded contractors for targeting “conspiracy theories about coronavirus vaccines.” But perhaps millions of tweets and other posts were suppressed for “disinformation” for claiming vaccines fail to prevent COVID transmission — a supposedly heinous lie that turned out to be true after the federal coverup collapsed. "The paper wailed about critics uncorking a “deluge of bad information about disinformation researchers.” One professor lamented that “there’s a lot of bad actors who are using freedom of information requests to harass academics working at public universities.” "But there is no “Doing God’s work” exemption for the Freedom of Information Act. "Federal agencies have stonewalled FOIA requests, but the Twitter Files, lawsuits and targeting federal grant recipients have begun to expose the sordid machinations. "But the paper has almost completely ignored recent revelations the State Department pressured Twitter to suspend more than 300,000 accounts (often on ludicrous pretexts) and the Biden White House pressured Facebook to suppress any posts critical of COVID vaccines. "And what about the FBI’s strong-arm tactics to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election?" https://nypost.com/2023/06/07/washington-throws-a-pity-party-for-federal-censors-finally-being-investigated/ Gotta love 'em! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettytom Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 (edited) 34 minutes ago, trastrick said: The U.S. has its own version of The Guardian, actually quite a few! But leading the pack are The Washington Post and the New York Times. Snipped: A load of off topic wiffle and waffle. Wrong thread. Start your own. Edited June 11, 2023 by Prettytom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 24 minutes ago, Prettytom said: Wrong thread. Start your own. For god's sake don't encourage him. It's nice to have most of the whiny snowflake cut n paste in just the one place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trastrick Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 (edited) 46 minutes ago, Prettytom said: Wrong thread. Start your own. No! If YOU wanna be moderator YOU start yer own Blog. 19 minutes ago, Hecate said: For god's sake don't encourage him. It's nice to have most of the whiny snowflake cut n paste in just the one place. May your god be with you, dearie! Edited June 11, 2023 by trastrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettytom Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 4 minutes ago, trastrick said: No! If YOU wanna be moderator YOU start yer own Blog. Wrong thread again. The angry, apoplectic man thread is …. Actually, on balance, this one will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trastrick Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 Just now, Prettytom said: Wrong thread again. The angry, apoplectic man thread is …. Actually, on balance, this one will do. Have a nice day! I'm off to the beach to talk to normal happy folk! And a beautiful ice cold Presidente Lite! The humidex is hitting 113, these days! Manana! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now