Magilla Posted August 9, 2023 Share Posted August 9, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Al Bundy said: Show me another article that mentions of the colour of the people involved on more than 10 occasions. Show me another article that doesn't relay what went on, and possible motives, in exactly the same way. 🙄 4 minutes ago, Al Bundy said: The Guardian has a sick obsession with skin colour that I want to highlight ,just accept it, don't fight it. You have a sick obsession with skin colour... you are highlighting it, with every post you make! It's the focus of the vast majority of your posts!🤣 Edited August 9, 2023 by Magilla 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Bundy Posted August 9, 2023 Share Posted August 9, 2023 1 minute ago, Magilla said: Show me another article that doesn't relay what went on, and possible motives, in exactly the same way. 🙄 You have a sick obsession with skin colour... you are highlighting it, with every post you make! It's the focus of the vast majority of your posts!🤣 It's ok if you can't. I understand. 👍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted August 9, 2023 Share Posted August 9, 2023 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Al Bundy said: It's ok if you can't. I understand. Imagine how embarrassing it would be if the initial Mail article reported the race of participants 11 times, and then in subsequent coverage... 13 times! 🤣🤣🤣 Clearly you do not understand, since you were completely wrong, provably so! 🙄 The hate and attempts at division, are all coming from you! Edited August 9, 2023 by Magilla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Bundy Posted August 9, 2023 Share Posted August 9, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Magilla said: Imagine how embarrassing it would be if the initial Mail article reported the race of participants 11 times, and then in subsequent coverage... 13 times! 🤣🤣🤣 Clearly you do not understand, since you were completely wrong, provably so! 🙄 The hate and attempts at division, are all coming from you! Like this one, that makes a point that it was NOT racially motivated? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12386017/Alabama-boat-brawl-Riverfront-Park-ship-captain-says-group-white-men-started-mass-fight-visit-year-stole-staff-GOLF-CART.html Edited August 9, 2023 by Al Bundy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted August 9, 2023 Share Posted August 9, 2023 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Al Bundy said: Like this one, that makes a point that it was NOT racially motivated? A subsequent article, relaying the view of one of the participants... which still goes on to highlight the race of those involved, over 10 times! 🤣 The Mails original article framed the incident in exactly the same terms as The Guardian, and every other news organisation, did. 🙄 As usual, your claims fall at the first hurdle, and have no merit. A product of your bias, hate, poor cognition skills... than anything based in fact Edited August 9, 2023 by Magilla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trastrick Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 (edited) With all the speculation circling the latest Trump Indictments, who better to opine on the U.S. Constitutional Crises than Hillary Clinton? The Guardian Hillary Clinton feels ‘profound sadness’ over Trump’s many indictments "Hillary Clinton said she did not “feel any satisfaction” about Donald Trump’s extreme legal predicament, as 13 more criminal charges were leveled against the former president in Georgia on Monday night. Instead, the former senator, secretary of state and presidential nominee said, she felt “great profound sadness”. "Clinton, 75, lost the 2016 election to Trump. On Monday, she was booked on MSNBC in part to discuss a new essay in the Atlantic, about the problem of loneliness in US society. But then news broke of Trump’s latest indictments, over his election subversion in Georgia in 2020. “I didn’t think that [the appearance] would be under these circumstances, yet another set of indictments,” Clinton said, laughing". Is she laughing? Or feeling "profound sadness"? What your guess? No comment on the fact that it was this woman who started the whole Trump circus, by financing and selling to the U.S. Government, and their pals in the Media, the "Russian Collusion" conspiracy theory Hoax going on 7 years ago now. Bizarro! https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/15/hillary-clinton-feels-profound-sadness-over-trumps-many-indictments Edited August 16, 2023 by trastrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie Bynnol Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, trastrick said: With all the speculation circling the latest Trump Indictments, who better to opine on the U.S. Constitutional Crises than Hillary Clinton? -------------------------------------waffle about Russian collusion------------------------------------ What speculation? There are two sets of State criminal charges and two sets of Federal charges. They will be heard and tested before Criminal judges some appointed by by Trump. The Mar-a-Lago classified documents case 40 charges, trial date: May 20, 2024 The Stormy Daniels hush money case 34 charges, trial date: March 25, 2024 in New York The Jan. 6 case 4 charges Georgia 2020 election interference There are also two civil lawsuits: Fraudulent claims of business worth to be heard in October totalling $250 million. Second E. Jean Carroll case to be heard in October totalling $10 million. With his history of pardoning terrorists, murderers and fraudsters he will find it easy to Pardon himself if he becomes the oldest ever President. Edited August 16, 2023 by Annie Bynnol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trastrick Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Annie Bynnol said: What speculation? This speculation If you put down the daily Left wing talking points memo, for a moment, and see what's going on in the real World. The Guardian Donald Trump indictment: what are the charges and what happens next? USNews.com Trump Indictment: What Happens Next? Reuters Trump indictment: what happens next in Georgia case? Al Jazeera What are the next steps in Trump’s criminal case in Georgia? NBC News What happens next after Trump's indictment on felony ...? Politico Trump indictment: What happens next? France 24 Now that Donald Trump has been indicted, what happens ...? CBS News What happens now that Trump has been indicted? The New York Times The Case Against Donald Trump, What happens next? And literally hundreds more! Edited August 16, 2023 by trastrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie Bynnol Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 16 minutes ago, trastrick said: This speculation If you put down the daily Left wing talking points memo, for a moment, and see what's going on in the real World. The Guardian Donald Trump indictment: what are the charges and what happens next? USNews.com Trump Indictment: What Happens Next? Reuters Trump indictment: what happens next in Georgia case? Al Jazeera What are the next steps in Trump’s criminal case in Georgia? NBC News What happens next after Trump's indictment on felony ...? Politico Trump indictment: What happens next? France 24 Now that Donald Trump has been indicted, what happens ...? CBS News What happens now that Trump has been indicted? The New York Times The Case Against Donald Trump, What happens next? And literally hundreds more! Speculation or explanation? People can now stop 'speculating' on his criminal involvement in criminal activities. Now we have had the criminal indictments and criminal charges laid out for all to see we can follow the events with the help of the explanations provided by real American reporters. Now we will see the legal process unfold. It is not speculation that in the The Mar-a-Lago classified documents case there are 40 Criminal charges. It is not speculation that in the The Stormy Daniels hush money case there are 34 Criminal charges. It is not speculation that in the Jan. 6 case there are 4 Criminal charges. It is not speculation that in the Georgia 2020 election interference there are 40 Criminal charges. Then there are the two civil lawsuits: It is not speculation that in the civil suit of Fraudulent claims of business worth to be heard in October totalling $250 million. It is not speculation that in the Second E. Jean Carroll case to be heard in October totalling $10 million. Something else that defines that the MSN are not 'speculating' but providing 'explanations' are the similarity of their headlines and reports. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trastrick Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) 16 hours ago, Annie Bynnol said: Something else that defines that the MSN are not 'speculating' but providing 'explanations' are the similarity of their headlines and reports. "the similarity of their headlines and reports". Yes, they are a virtual echo chamber for each other. (aka the "narrative", aka the Democrat talking points) They all lay out the case for the prosecution, and scoff at any defense. (see links above, and your recent posts) They have accused him, found him guilty, and all but sentenced him. Without a trial. For going on 7 years now. Edited August 17, 2023 by trastrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now