Jump to content

Asylum 'Amnesty' To Clear Backlog Of 90,000 Claims


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, The_DADDY said:

More than 12,000 migrants from five countries with highest asylum success rates will have applications processed without interviews

Asylum seekers will be given the right to live in the UK without having face-to-face interviews to check their claims under government plans to reduce the backlog of cases.

 

 

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/02/23/asylum-amnesty-clear-backlog-90000-claims/

 

Your thoughts?

It's in the Torygraph, they'd tell you the Moon's made of green cheese if they thought folk'd be daft enough to read it!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The entry forms need one minor adjustment.

First question should be: Did you enter the country through legal channels? 

Yes - Continue form
No - Detain and Deport immediately. 

That will cut hundreds if not thousands from the backlog. 

The interviews are ABSOLUTELY necessary as a security measure. It's easy to lie on a bit of paper. Not so easy to lie to a trained person's face.  Getting rid of the interviews WILL have dire consequences further down the road

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Resident said:

The entry forms need one minor adjustment.

First question should be: Did you enter the country through legal channels? 

Yes - Continue form
No - Detain and Deport immediately. 

That will cut hundreds if not thousands from the backlog. 

The interviews are ABSOLUTELY necessary as a security measure. It's easy to lie on a bit of paper. Not so easy to lie to a trained person's face.  Getting rid of the interviews WILL have dire consequences further down the road

It is an early April fools joke.

 

Face to face interviews are necessary.  This link is interesting from a Manchester immigration lawyer firm.  Who pays the Manchester immigration lawyer firm for the coaching they give to asylum seekers?

https://manchester-immigrationlawyer.co.uk/asylum/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Axe said:

It is an early April fools joke.

 

Face to face interviews are necessary.  This link is interesting from a Manchester immigration lawyer firm.  Who pays the Manchester immigration lawyer firm for the coaching they give to asylum seekers?

https://manchester-immigrationlawyer.co.uk/asylum/

 

That's the even bigger joke. WE pay for it via legal aid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Resident said:

The entry forms need one minor adjustment.

First question should be: Did you enter the country through legal channels? 

Yes - Continue form
No - Detain and Deport immediately. 

That will cut hundreds if not thousands from the backlog. 

The interviews are ABSOLUTELY necessary as a security measure. It's easy to lie on a bit of paper. Not so easy to lie to a trained person's face.  Getting rid of the interviews WILL have dire consequences further down the road

If only it was that easy.

 

Be loads of human rights lawyers and lefties chomping at the bit to let them stay..  As long as they don't move in next door to them though.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11799331/MPs-lead-anger-blocked-deportation-Jamaican-criminal-later-committed-murder.html

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.