You've Got To Be Choking!

[Magilla]

Just now, HumbleNarrator said:

*nothing to see here, nothing to see here, no inappropriate sexualization of children, nothing to see here.*

Correct.

 

Just now, HumbleNarrator said:

Just like the was nothing to see throughout the years of speculation regarding child abuse in Rotherham before it eventually turned out to be true.

Incorrect.

[fools]

5 hours ago, Palomar said:

The link is painfully obvious.

 

After more than a decade of increasingly incompetent governance the Tories are scraping the culture war barrel to appeal to fools like fools

welcome to the club

[Mister M]

7 hours ago, Chekhov said:

To be fair to Miriam Cates she was one of the Tory rebels who voted against the government and finally pressured them to ignore the scaremongering Covid "experts" and get us all back to normal*.

Britain then led the world in a return to normality, so she has a claim to have helped change the world.

So, even if she gets voted out at the next GE, she has made a big difference in her one term in parliament.

 

* as an aside this also proved the "experts" had no clothes.

Can I ask Chekhov, are you married?

Edited March 11, 2023 by Mister M

[Chekhov]

3 hours ago, Magilla said:

*in your head!

 

Lots desperate attempts to highlight your inability to comprehend the scope of issues you clearly have no idea about... in the wrong thread... be that Covid, climate change, what women should think or any rights based issue... there really isn't anything beyond ridiculous whining hyperbole.

Stop digressing, I have demolished your argument, here.

I am surprised you want to argue about this on this thread rather than the Covid thread (where I demolished your argument), but if that's what you want.

 

>>your inability to comprehend the scope of issues you clearly have no idea about<<

 

Question, why, if you want to be consistent, do you think they should let people vote on anything ?

 

Lastly, your faith in "experts" is, worrying, bearing in mind how wrong they frequently are :

 

Mid March 2020 : "We could have half a million Covid deaths in the UK"
19 March 2020 : "12 weeks to flatten the curve".
Late March 2020 : "This virus is indiscriminate"
May 2020 : "Politicians have become more cautious about immunisation prospects. They are right to be"
November 2020 : "Modelling suggests 4,000 deaths per day in the worst case scenario".
Spring 2021 : "Get double vaccinated to get out of Covid and back to normal" (it actually took a further year).
July 2021 : "Freedom day is irresponsible, we could have 200K cases per day by August".
11 Dec 2021 : "Omicron could cause 75,000 deaths in England by end of April"
Dec 2021 : "Central estimate" 2890 Omicron deaths a day
15 Dec 2021 : "Omicron likely to be the biggest threat of Covid pandemic so far".

 

I can supply the original sources for pretty much all of this if required....

 

 

Edited March 11, 2023 by Chekhov

[Chekhov]

21 minutes ago, Mister M said:

Can I ask Chekhov, are you married?

Bearing in mind my socially conservative views and I have a child, what do you think ?

The fact you have asked that question proves you don't actually read certainly remember, half the posts you read

 

 

[Mister M]

23 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

Bearing in mind my socially conservative views and I have a child, what do you think ?

The fact you have asked that question proves you don't actually read certainly remember, half the posts you read

 

 

Lots of people are Conservative and lead a rainbow of existences, just like some people have radical ideas but are fairly conventional.

No I was just wondering if you talk to your partner about Covid-19 a lot?

[Magilla]

59 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

Stop digressing, I have demolished your argument, here.

*in your head.

 

[Chekhov]

27 minutes ago, Mister M said:

No I was just wondering if you talk to your partner about Covid-19 a lot?

I try not to. She is more in the middle than me. She thinks it was an over reaction and the government were trying to scare us, but she is less confident than me about how little suppression we could have got away with.

 

2 minutes ago, Magilla said:

>>Chekhov said: Stop digressing, I have demolished your argument, here.<<

 

*in your head.

Methinks you do protest too much.

I invite anyone to read the linked to post if they are tempted to believe you.

Edited March 11, 2023 by Chekhov

[Magilla]

1 minute ago, Chekhov said:

Methinks you do protest too much.

I invite anyone to read the linked to post if they are tempted to believe you.

I'm not protesting, I'm just pointing out that whatever argument you think you demolished... was made up in your head.

 

That is self evidently true.

[Chekhov]

13 hours ago, Magilla said:

I'm not protesting, I'm just pointing out that whatever argument you think you demolished... was made up in your head.

That is self evidently true.

It is impossible to debate with anyone who ignores facts, even ones with linked to original sources.

One can only hope that the odd unbiased reader of this thread can recognise the actual situation here.