Jump to content

Scc. We Need Your Help. We're Clueless!


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Michael_N said:

Yet The Headrow and Eastgate keeps its buses so people can use public transport direct to the shops, not having to walk a fair old distance from Arundel Gate through to Pinstone Street. :D

Many places wrestle with striking the right balance of a good pedestrian environment with reasonable access to public transport.
 

Bradford are proposing to pedestrianise most of their city centre core which means many bus routes and stops are relocated to the peripheral route. Bus operators aren’t thrilled with it and discussions are ongoing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Planner1 said:

Many places wrestle with striking the right balance of a good pedestrian environment with reasonable access to public transport.
 

Bradford are proposing to pedestrianise most of their city centre core which means many bus routes and stops are relocated to the peripheral route. Bus operators aren’t thrilled with it and discussions are ongoing.

It was a good balance before with having Barker's Pool, Farge & Leopold Square all pedestrianised, oh and Chapel Walk too! We have a silly situation now with buses doubling back on themselves along Division Street and strangely enough stopping bang outside the council's new pet toy, the outdoor playground. What a coincidence! 🤔

 

It's cars that need to be banned from Surrey Street/the side of the Lyceum. It's a nightmare trying to cross from the mini Interchange going towards the Sexual Health Clinic.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Irene Swaine said:

It was a good balance before with having Barker's Pool, Farge & Leopold Square all pedestrianised, oh and Chapel Walk too! We have a silly situation now with buses doubling back on themselves along Division Street and strangely enough stopping bang outside the council's new pet toy, the outdoor playground. What a coincidence! 🤔

 

It's cars that need to be banned from Surrey Street/the side of the Lyceum. It's a nightmare trying to cross from the mini Interchange going towards the Sexual Health Clinic.

 

 

Odd how that's the building you chose to reference. Something you want to tell us? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Irene Swaine said:

SNIPPED

It's cars that need to be banned from Surrey Street/the side of the Lyceum. It's a nightmare trying to cross from the mini Interchange going towards the Sexual Health Clinic.

 

 

Cars definitely pull out quicker than pedestrians round there 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Odd how that's the building you chose to reference. Something you want to tell us? 

Well it is the first thing you see when you cross from the Interchange...that and the law firm whose name evades me.

16 minutes ago, MJ01 said:

Cars definitely pull out quicker than pedestrians round there 

It's an absolute nightmare, made worse by the scaffolding/building blocks, crossing that entire stretch of road is tricky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 17/05/2023 at 19:34, Irene Swaine said:

IIt's a nightmare trying to cross from the mini Interchange going towards the Sexual Health Clinic.

 

 

 

On 17/05/2023 at 19:57, HeHasRisen said:

Odd how that's the building you chose to reference. Something you want to tell us? 

Surely the 'SNIPPED' indicates a Vasectomy Clinic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/05/2023 at 14:38, Planner1 said:

I just don’t understand the motivation for telling a lie about the CAZ on air.

 

They know that people scrutinise everything they say, so why would they lie about asking the government to defer or not impose the CAZ?

 

If they hadn’t asked and were doing it because they thought it was the right thing, I’d expect they’d say so.

Because that is their nature... need I say "tree felling"?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/05/2023 at 14:38, Planner1 said:

I just don’t understand the motivation for telling a lie about the CAZ on air.

 

They know that people scrutinise everything they say, so why would they lie about asking the government to defer or not impose the CAZ?

 

If they hadn’t asked and were doing it because they thought it was the right thing, I’d expect they’d say so.

you might want to pop onto the congestion charge thread........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.