melthebell Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 (edited) 27 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: There is something that has always been on my mind regarding 911. Three rather large buildings all basically disintegrated into their own footprints. Those who debunk the conspiracy theories say that this was inevitable given the nature of the damage inflicted on the buildings. Why then were firefighters (who presumably have a large degree of understanding of how buildings behave as a result of significant structural and fire damage) in the buildings for so long given their collapse was liable to happen? doing their job trying to save people Edited May 10, 2023 by melthebell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fools Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: even the highly trained emergency services. they did the second time though, do you think they had the time (or expertise) to evaluate the structural possibilities of such a rare scenario. Look at the footage before they went up, they didn't look very content about what they were about to be asked to do Edited May 10, 2023 by fools Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: Emergency services are trained to not place themselves in clear and avoidable danger, hence why police officer's for instance refrain from going into rivers to rescue someone struggling in the water. Despite the conspiracy debunkers insistence that a building disintegrating into it's own footprint is what naturally follows from a jumbo jet flying into it, NOBODY saw it coming, even the highly trained emergency services. Did they know it was disintegrating into its own footprint? the trouble is everybody else is looking at it after the fact, they were there att he time, trying to do what they do, save people, maybe it collapsed sooner than they thought, maybe they shouldve pulled out sooner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fools Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: Why didn't they see it coming with the first building? how often has exactly the same thing happened before. a car park collapsed the other day, why didn't someone see that coming Edited May 10, 2023 by fools Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cressida Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 I was watching the second plane go into the twin tower as it happened, unbelievable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fools Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 (edited) 7 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: Despite how unnatural it looked for those buildings to come down the way they did and how it looked just like a controlled demolition, It got rammed down our throat's that it was/is the natural consequence of planes going into them. What plane went into Building 7?? Building 7 was damaged in a very different way - but somehow came down just the same! if one floor gives way, and collapses onto the next, and so on, it's not hard to comprehend at all. so the question is, do you believe that a plane and fuel, and building design mixed with a possibly incapable fire cladding situation could possibly cause one floor to collapse. or do you believe somehow, it was all wired up in the night, and nobody noticed and nobody snitched there was a collapse in miami not long ago, caused by a leaky swimming pool, this stuff happens all the time Edited May 10, 2023 by fools Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fools Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: Conspiracy theorists suggest explosive charges were being put in strategic places. Minutes before the buildings came down, lots of people, including firefighter reported hearing explosions. When they demolish a building, they spend weeks/months rigging it, and weakening structural components, you'd think in a building of that size, someone would notice. and then there's the small matter of a plane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 20 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said: Pretty sure the twin towers were designed not to pancake in that way. Small planes have crashed into buildings before but how many times during history has two 747s crashed into a building (well 2 buildings next to each other)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KP Nuts Posted May 17, 2023 Share Posted May 17, 2023 (edited) @top4718 How's the conspiracy coming along? Don't know if you're on Twitter or not but happened upon this thread on there. And no, I wasn't researching. Edited May 17, 2023 by KP Nuts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Bundy Posted May 17, 2023 Share Posted May 17, 2023 6 hours ago, KP Nuts said: @top4718 How's the conspiracy coming along? Don't know if you're on Twitter or not but happened upon this thread on there. And no, I wasn't researching. I don't get it. What's it mean? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now