Jump to content

Nurse Lucy Letby Has Been Found Guilty Of Murdering Seven Newborn Babies,


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jack Grey said:

I saw pictures of her house when she was getting arrested on the news

 

It was very nice

 

I thought all nurses were living in squalor and using food banks 

I understood she lived with her parents.

You trying to use her case to pull all nurses down ?

that doesn't surprise me.

 

Did you notice her Rolls Royce parked on the drive too ?

Edited by Organgrinder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letby owned her own home, as Cressida says she’s been rehoused and no need to worry about paying a mortgage.

 

Letby lived alone in a semi-detached home in the cathedral city of Chester in north-west England, on a quiet street of neat lawns and privet hedges. Her neighbours were either retired or couples with children. They would rarely see the young, blond woman who had moved into the house in March 2016 – she worked nights at first, then soon moved to day shifts, when she would leave with her Morrisons bag for life before dawn and rarely return until late.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Al Bundy said:

 

When speaking about this particular case?

 

I've not checked. 

 

Maybe you could show me an article discussing this case and stating that sometimes there is no explanation....but then manages to swerve in a predictable pathetic jibe against the government.   So basically they ARE trying to make out there is an explanation aren't they.

 

Using this horrific case to highlight their narrative is just what I would expect from the vile Guardian.

 

 

So you haven't bothered to check the reports in the other papers.  Perhaps you should do that first before having a pop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Mister M said:

Are you not guilty too of using this horrific case to take a swipe at the Guardian?

No.

 

That's just you trying to twist stuff as per usual for likes.

31 minutes ago, Zinger549 said:

So you haven't bothered to check the reports in the other papers.  Perhaps you should do that first before having a pop.

Why?

 

My purpose is to expose the Guardian for what it is.  Nothing stopping you from doing what you suggest though.

👍

Edited by Al Bundy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Mister M said:

Are you not guilty too of using this horrific case to take a swipe at the Guardian?

Absolutely... but then, you'd have to have some self awareness to spot it 🙄

 

11 minutes ago, Al Bundy said:

My purpose is to expose the Guardian for what it is.

Clearly, the notion that what you're really doing is exposing yourself for what you are...

 

...has not registered! 🤣

Edited by Magilla
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Al Bundy said:

No.

 

That's just you trying to twist stuff as per usual for likes.

Why?

 

My purpose is to expose the Guardian for what it is.  Nothing stopping you from doing what you suggest though.

👍

So it's ok for other papers (Mail, Express ect) to do it but not The Guardian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Al Bundy said:

No.

 

That's just you trying to twist stuff as per usual for likes.

Why?

 

My purpose is to expose the Guardian for what it is.  Nothing stopping you from doing what you suggest though.

👍

I'm not twisting anything.

I'm just repeating your words back to yourself. 

You've only got yourself to blame if you don't like what you read. Take responsibility.

Edited by Mister M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.