El Cid Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 On 26/08/2023 at 10:38, HeHasRisen said: It's some American nutjob, no connection to Letby or her family or legal team. The foaming at the mouth can cease. Is it just a scam to get themselves money? You would think we would be reading about an appeal and fund raiser from Letbys team. I haven't followed the case, so I will have to go with the jury's verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 2 hours ago, Prettytom said: It’s a properly weird mix of made up stuff and right wing sock puppets all agreeing with themselves. If it was a pub, I’d be in a different one. Something like a budgie in Sues pub. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 20 hours ago, Hecate said: This forum is getting increasingly odd. sadly since covid more and more people are starting to question everything and turn everything into a conspiracy, even the stupid stuff also more and more people are believing any old claptrap emanating from the right. With the advances of AI, nothing will be real anymore, everything will be false and its gonna be a horrible future world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, melthebell said: sadly since covid more and more people are starting to question everything and turn everything into a conspiracy, even the stupid stuff also more and more people are believing any old claptrap emanating from the right. With the advances of AI, nothing will be real anymore, everything will be false and its gonna be a horrible future world. Or the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chekhov Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 7 hours ago, Prettytom said: It’s a properly weird mix of made up stuff and right wing sock puppets all agreeing with themselves. Funnily enough, in my experience, it's the Leftie authoritarians who all like to "up vote" each others posts. The libertarians don't bother so much. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 9 hours ago, HeHasRisen said: Missed the line where she said she hadn't even read anything. Anna you are an absolute embarrassment. Maybe step away from the thread before you embarrass yourself further. I said I hadn't followed the case, which would have been difficult as it wasn't in the news even though it was underway for more than a year. All I had was what little had been on the news about the verdict, at which point I said my gut instinct was something was wrong, but maybe it was because I just found it hard to imagine anyone being that evil. The following day there were numerous reports in different papers giving different versions and snippets of information, but my main source was the Daily Mail because of its obvious negative bias and unbridled, over the top use of language, and was intrigued by how it had glossed over certain points which I thought were highly relevant, and missed out completely facts mentioned in other sources which put a different slant on it. Enough to make me wonder. Without reading the court transcripts that's all anyone has to go on, but there's nothing I've said which hasn't been solidly reported in the MS media. including the difficulty the jury had in reaching its conclusions. She may well have done it, but If some of the jury who were there, were undecided, I feel absolutely no embarrassment in admitting I remain undecided myself. Not that it makes the slightest bit of difference what I think anyway, so feel free to express as much hatred for the woman as you want, but I won't be joining in. I'm sorry if that upsets you.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 20 minutes ago, Anna B said: I said I hadn't followed the case, which would have been difficult as it wasn't in the news even though it was underway for more than a year. All I had was what little had been on the news about the verdict, at which point I said my gut instinct was something was wrong, but maybe it was because I just found it hard to imagine anyone being that evil. The following day there were numerous reports in different papers giving different versions and snippets of information, but my main source was the Daily Mail because of its obvious negative bias and unbridled, over the top use of language, and was intrigued by how it had glossed over certain points which I thought were highly relevant, and missed out completely facts mentioned in other sources which put a different slant on it. Enough to make me wonder. Without reading the court transcripts that's all anyone has to go on, but there's nothing I've said which hasn't been solidly reported in the MS media. including the difficulty the jury had in reaching its conclusions. She may well have done it, but If some of the jury who were there, were undecided, I feel absolutely no embarrassment in admitting I remain undecided myself. Not that it makes the slightest bit of difference what I think anyway, so feel free to express as much hatred for the woman as you want, but I won't be joining in. I'm sorry if that upsets you.... Anna you are entitled to have a view. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dardandec Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 Some babies were injected with insulin and some with air, this was proved. If it wasn't Lucy Letby, there is still a baby killer on the loose heaven forbid. Love or hate the BBC, The Panorama program "Lucy Letby, The Nurse Who Killed" gives a good insight. Available on I Player. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettytom Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 2 hours ago, harvey19 said: Anna you are entitled to have a view. It would be a better view if she’d bothered to read some of the details from the trial. Without knowledge of that, her view is worthless. A bit like yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2023 Share Posted August 28, 2023 9 hours ago, Anna B said: I said I hadn't followed the case, which would have been difficult as it wasn't in the news even though it was underway for more than a year. All I had was what little had been on the news about the verdict, at which point I said my gut instinct was something was wrong, but maybe it was because I just found it hard to imagine anyone being that evil. BBC News covered every day of the trial from October last year. Here's one from October 17th. Scroll down to the bottom to see earlier daily updates. The Guardian did the same, and I'm sure other papers did too. BBC News reported the story since it came to light in 2017 and it picked up speed when Letby was arrested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now