RollingJ Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 1 minute ago, Mister M said: Maybe he was each of those things. Up until a few years ago, no one would've guessed just how many officers in the Met were wrong' uns, and often of much worse character than many of the people they dealt with in their jobs. His passenger was reported as 'carrying a machete' - what for, one wonders - cutting his nails? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 4 minutes ago, Mister M said: Maybe he was each of those things. Up until a few years ago, no one would've guessed just how many officers in the Met were wrong' uns, and often of much worse character than many of the people they dealt with in their jobs. Hmmm, yes maybe. And maybe he didn't realise his passenger had a machete and just thought he was pleased to see him 🤔 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_999uk Posted September 25, 2023 Author Share Posted September 25, 2023 Funny how often the criminal records of those killed by police swiftly makes it into the hands of the press, but the disciplinary record of the actual killer doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 3 minutes ago, dan_999uk said: Funny how often the criminal records of those killed by police swiftly makes it into the hands of the press, but the disciplinary record of the actual killer doesn't. If there is one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHasRisen Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 7 minutes ago, dan_999uk said: Funny how often the criminal records of those killed by police swiftly makes it into the hands of the press, but the disciplinary record of the actual killer doesn't. Wouldn't any previous court appearances be a matter of public record? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_999uk Posted September 25, 2023 Author Share Posted September 25, 2023 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHasRisen Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 35 minutes ago, dan_999uk said: No. You mean yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Bundy Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 2 hours ago, The_DADDY said: Poor lad. Salt of the earth. He wouldn't hurt a fly. He was a good boy really. He loved his Nan etc etc etc His lifelong ambition was to become a lawyer or doctor, etc etc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 5 hours ago, Organgrinder said: That's correct but, we know that the bloke was unarmed. If he had a genuinely good reason for shooting him dead, that should be proved in the trial. I don't know what your Legal credentials amount to, but you had better get down there and defend him then. I know just enough, to realise that they don't usually arrest and charge people, especially coppers, who have not broken the law. If coppers are allowed to shoot dead, unarmed citizens, then he will walk free so why worry ? He's Suspected of breaking the law . Thats why he's got a court date . Where it will say if he has or has not broken the law . What do your legal credentials amount to ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m williamson Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 16 minutes ago, Al Bundy said: His lifelong ambition was to become a lawyer or doctor, etc etc. So he was a wrong un then? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now