Jump to content

They Shoot Horses, Dont They?


Recommended Posts

A friend has just had his 15 year old labrador put down. It must have been a really hard thing to do.

 

I notice Ester Ranzen is in the news. Should we allow youthenasia?

The broadcaster Dame Esther Rantzen says she has joined the Dignitas assisted dying clinic in Switzerland.

The 83-year-old told the BBC she is currently undergoing a "miracle" treatment for stage four lung cancer.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67756506

 

Most times, life is prolonged, beyond what is useful. But most do chose to live, is that changing?

 

 

Edited by El Cid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pyrotequila said:

Personally I think it should be the choice of the individual, as long as they are of sound enough mind to make the choice themselves.

That's the whole controversy, are they of sound mind?

 

I really don't know what's right to be honest, but if I had to choose I would have to agree with you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pyrotequila said:

Personally I think it should be the choice of the individual, as long as they are of sound enough mind to make the choice themselves.

Unfortunately this will be a major stumbling block, as many old people have Dementia or Alzheimers. 

Palliative care is all very well but at £1,000  a week to drool in the corner of a care home, would you want to see your loved ones deprived of an inheritance.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People with terminal and/or degenerative diseases should have the right to choose their exit route.  For some, unfortunately leave it too late and don't have the means or the physical or mental capability to get there under their own steam and so suffer a sometimes long and agonising existence until natural death.  To be assisted by a partner,  relative or friend would leave them open to be convicted of a serious criminal offence.

I believe that there should be a better discussion with lawyers, physicians and parliamentarians and some guiding principles drawn up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tipstaff said:

People with terminal and/or degenerative diseases should have the right to choose their exit route.  For some, unfortunately leave it too late and don't have the means or the physical or mental capability to get there under their own steam and so suffer a sometimes long and agonising existence until natural death.  To be assisted by a partner,  relative or friend would leave them open to be convicted of a serious criminal offence.

I believe that there should be a better discussion with lawyers, physicians and parliamentarians and some guiding principles drawn up. 

Perhaps something that can be along the same lines as a will, but only opened on diagnosis of a terminal illness etc..?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Anna B said:

Unfortunately this will be a major stumbling block, as many old people have Dementia or Alzheimers. 

Palliative care is all very well but at £1,000  a week to drool in the corner of a care home, would you want to see your loved ones deprived of an inheritance.

Give it all away to who you want before going into a care home!

Don’t agree with euthanasia at all.

 

echo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.