Red Sea Bullsht?

[PRESLEY]

13 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Of course he can't, he's now doubling down with big text because he can't read properly. 

He would start an argument in an empty room ffs. 

Start an argument in an empty room,  thats a classic coming from you. 

[Al Bundy]

54 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Of course he can't, he's now doubling down with big text because he can't read properly. 

He would start an argument in an empty room ffs. 

Funny though!

 

He has become the forums gonk.

[Chekhov]

17 hours ago, Jack Grey said:

So apparently prices of everything have to go up because a few drones and missiles have been fired at some ships

But NATO has sent the best navy ships in the world and the Suez Canal is still open and its business as usual 

Are businesses just taking advantage of another conflict to falsely inflate prices and profits? 

It's about time the navy did what we pay it to do, keep the seaways open.

[Guest]

1 hour ago, hackey lad said:

He’s proven himself wrong with his own words but still can’t see it .  

You have proven once again that you never address the subject but concentrate on what a poster says instead.

Maybe you don't know what or where the red sea is ?

 

46 minutes ago, Al Bundy said:

Funny though!

 

He has become the forums gonk.

I don't mind at all.    Every honour is accepted whilst I get your back up.

I have still contributed to the the thread whilst you are scratching your head and getting nowhere,  as always.

 

[Guest]

31 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

It's about time the navy did what we pay it to do, keep the seaways open.

Why ?    Is it our bit of seaway ?

[hackey lad]

5 minutes ago, Organgrinder said:

You have proven once again that you never address the subject but concentrate on what a poster says instead.

Maybe you don't know what or where the red sea is ?

 

I don't mind at all.    Every honour is accepted whilst I get your back up.

I have still contributed to the the thread whilst you are scratching your head and getting nowhere,  as always.

 

Yes, I do concentrate on what a poster says . Not bad for someone who can’t read , as you say .

[Jack Grey]

34 minutes ago, Chekhov said:

It's about time the navy did what we pay it to do, keep the seaways open.

Yeah well they have no intention of protecting our borders so they might as well earn their money over there instead of sailing around the Caribbean for 6 months 

[Guest]

2 hours ago, HeHasRisen said:

Of course he can't, he's now doubling down with big text because he can't read properly. 

He would start an argument in an empty room ffs. 

Try sticking to the argument instead of trying to derail it.

 

You don't contest my comment but insist that it's the word  "WILLINGLY"  that makes the difference.

 

EXPLAIN  WHY  that should be so.

I'm fully expecting a  "I can't be bothered"  next.

[HeHasRisen]

I mean I've literally already explained it. Go and argue with someone else. 

 

If it shuts you up, you win. Well done.  Even though you don't. 

 

Now let's all move on. 

Edited January 5 by HeHasRisen

[Guest]

3 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

I mean I've literally already explained it. Go and argue with someone else. 

 

If it shuts you up, you win. Well done.  Even though you don't. 

 

Now let's all move on. 

You never did explain why  "willingly"  makes such a big difference to the sentence.           But, OK.   no explanation then as I expected.     Case closed.