El Cid Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 6 hours ago, Resident said: His country of origin is known to the authorities. Because the Conservatives are only interested in using immigration as a political issue and not solving the problem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Posted February 2 Author Share Posted February 2 18 minutes ago, Delayed said: The fact that he received a suspended sentence means that he wasn't eligible for a deportation order. The judge clearly didn't seem the sexual offence serous enough to warrant a harsher sentence or considered this person's character or background in their sentencing. And you can't ban people claiming asylum. How many times does it need to be said? You can remove, deport and ban from entering the UK. But if someone arrives and claims asylum you can't ignore it and put them on a plane. Which is why the 1st question on the asylum for should read: 1. Did the applicant arrive in the UK via legal channels? Yes - Continue with application No - Detain and deport immediately You've not ignored the application that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delayed Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Just now, Resident said: Which is why the 1st question on the asylum for should read: 1. Did the applicant arrive in the UK via legal channels? Yes - Continue with application No - Detain and deport immediately You've not ignored the application that way. You can't ignore any asylum claim based on how someone managed to come into the UK. If you could, the government wouldn't have a backlog and resort to Rwanda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Posted February 2 Author Share Posted February 2 Just now, Delayed said: You can't ignore any asylum claim based on how someone managed to come into the UK. If you could, the government wouldn't have a backlog and resort to Rwanda It's not ignoring it. It's specifically asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delayed Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Just now, Resident said: It's not ignoring it. It's specifically asking. Irrelevant. You can't detain and deport without considering the asylum claim first. Then if the claim is refused, it's likely to have appeal rights which means you can't keep detaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delbow Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 7 hours ago, hackey lad said: Never miss an opportunity to blame someone else . It must be 12 years of Conservative government rubbing off on me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmam Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 My question is why is this animal still in the UK? Because this country is run by do-gooders, just look at most of the crimes that are committed here and decide for yourself just who's committing them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukdobby Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 18 minutes ago, vmam said: My question is why is this animal still in the UK? Because this country is run by do-gooders, just look at most of the crimes that are committed here and decide for yourself just who's committing them. Thing is the do gooders disappear when this kind of things happen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Bundy Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Crikey, he looks a heartbreaker. Do criminal parasites all use the same barber? I hope the human rights lawyer who advised him to try and fool the kind hearted UK into believing he had become a changed man, never has the misfortune of one of their loved ones blinded by acid from a person who shouldn't be roaming the streets. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 7 hours ago, peak4 said: Here you go https://archive.is/8U1lz For future reference; I did post it on another thread, insert archive.is/ in between https//: and www.~ of the original URL Is someone else has already archived it, then the resulting page might be available from behind the paywall; you can also archive links yourself, but sometimes it takes several hours to process and return a URL. As for why his application for asylum was granted, after his previous conviction, seems very odd to me. It's possible that he would have faced the death penalty for something if returned from whence he came. I think this would make it impossible to deport him under our laws, had his application been rejected; in which case it might have seemed reasonable to accept him at the time. On the other hand, if rejected and the deportation country refused to accept them back, capital punishment issues or or not, and that return country refused to let a deportee off the plane, how can we deport them? He is apparently Afghani, so there might not be much leverage available, between us and the government there. I can't offer a solution personally which would be totally effective. Maybe tell any country which won't accept someone back, that we will refuse visas for any of their nationals until they accede to our request. My bold: That is, in my opinion, a surprisingly good answer to this problem which seems to crop up more and more frequently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now