Padders Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 7 minutes ago, hackey lad said: An answer to my question above would be great , please . Hackey, your a bit argumentative tonight. Are your Plymouth's playing up again? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 4 minutes ago, Rockers rule said: Just as crazy as building your forces on someone else's boarder and not telling them your going to invade No comparison at all. The Russian buildup on the Ukraine border which was visible by satellite and other intelligence involved conventional weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 16 minutes ago, Axe said: Be more crazy not to inform other nuclear nations that a test in which a missile was intended to fly thousands of miles and land safely in the sea was taking place. I agree but informing the media was a stupid move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRESLEY Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 16 minutes ago, hackey lad said: An answer to my question above would be great , please . Look at post No2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 25 minutes ago, PRESLEY said: Look at post No2. Where does that say it’s not important? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 31 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: I agree but informing the media was a stupid move. I do not think the media were informed. The media found out and Grant Shapps has made a statement to parliament. No big deal because as been pointed out it was a test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 2 hours ago, PRESLEY said: So a test is not just a test, so there is a imperative reason for them. hackey thinks we can just carry on testing them every twelve years until we get it right. In the meantime, if we have a war, we'll just have to get our catapults out and manage with them. Putin must have nearly died laughing. God, preserve us from our own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockers rule Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 1 hour ago, Axe said: No comparison at all. The Russian buildup on the Ukraine border which was visible by satellite and other intelligence involved conventional weapons. And then the threats of using nuclear weapons . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 20 minutes ago, Organgrinder said: hackey thinks we can just carry on testing them every twelve years until we get it right. In the meantime, if we have a war, we'll just have to get our catapults out and manage with them. Putin must have nearly died laughing. God, preserve us from our own. Do you really think that is the only missile we have ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 (edited) 3 hours ago, hackey lad said: Its a test , do it until it works properly . They don't do that though, 2 tests in what 12 years, and both have failed, they don't test willy willy as each missile costs millions, so they only fire one. Again if they needed to fire a live one tommorow what would the difference be?, blind patriotism won't fix it, schnapps blindly saying it'll be reyt won't fix it Edited February 21 by melthebell 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now