Jump to content

22 March: A New Chapter For Supertram


Recommended Posts

On 25/04/2024 at 04:01, RollingJ said:

They did - and Stagecoach got the blame - so - quid pro co?

Most of the vehicles are old, obsolete and need replacing. Same for whoever is operating them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Planner1 said:

Most of the vehicles are old, obsolete and need replacing. Same for whoever is operating them.

I know they are old - apart from the Tram Trains, most of them are the original rolling stock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/04/2024 at 20:00, hackey lad said:

Well Oliver , two broken down Trams  on the Blue line at this very moment .  The start of your new adventure  is looking very ropey . 

 

On 24/04/2024 at 21:01, RollingJ said:

They did - and Stagecoach got the blame - so - quid pro co?

The point here surely is that replacing the knackered fleet and/or changes to maintenance are not something that is going to be sorted overnight, and there is such a thing as a honeymoon period.

 

Like I said in my comment earlier in this thread, we should take the 'positives' with a pinch of salt, it's only fair that we apply the same logic to negatives - if most of us agree that Stagecoach have not exactly run the system well for the last however many years then it stands to reason that meaningful improvements will take time.

 

It's right that broken down trams are still flagged up as an important issue that needs addressing, but actively 'blaming' the new regime for it, or saying that it somehow proves this new regime isn't going to work seems a tad ludicrous. 

 

Also, trams do break down. Even new trams, with good maintenance. So, lets see what the trend in breakdowns is like after 1-2 years of new ownership, not try and draw conclusions from one day. If it's no better, I'll be as disappointed as you two, I promise.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

   The tendering process for the full rebuild and  refurbishment of original fleet will reveal if it will be more economic to replace them. Having proved to be the best 'modern' UK tram by streets the rebuild/or replacement  can be staggered over several years. There is no technical reason why a 20 year life extension cannot be achieved - only a disability access issue( solved in modern trams with low floors throughout0, 

   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AndrewC said:

 

The point here surely is that replacing the knackered fleet and/or changes to maintenance are not something that is going to be sorted overnight, and there is such a thing as a honeymoon period.

 

Like I said in my comment earlier in this thread, we should take the 'positives' with a pinch of salt, it's only fair that we apply the same logic to negatives - if most of us agree that Stagecoach have not exactly run the system well for the last however many years then it stands to reason that meaningful improvements will take time.

 

It's right that broken down trams are still flagged up as an important issue that needs addressing, but actively 'blaming' the new regime for it, or saying that it somehow proves this new regime isn't going to work seems a tad ludicrous. 

 

Also, trams do break down. Even new trams, with good maintenance. So, lets see what the trend in breakdowns is like after 1-2 years of new ownership, not try and draw conclusions from one day. If it's no better, I'll be as disappointed as you two, I promise.

Dunno why you quoted me in there - but no matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RollingJ said:

Dunno why you quoted me in there - but no matter.

Because you were referring to the blame being put on Coppard et al. It was context to the point I was making about being careful putting too much blame on a new operator so soon in to their tenure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AndrewC said:

Because you were referring to the blame being put on Coppard et al. It was context to the point I was making about being careful putting too much blame on a new operator so soon in to their tenure.

Indeed. Just like someone taking over a local online forum should be given time too... 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.