peak4 Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 Clearly I have no idea of the truth in this, but the post makes for an interesting read From Twitter Nicole Minet @mouvement33 via Threadreader https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1778566905881829792.html I've been waiting 29 years to tell this story about OJ and his days at USC. Now that he's dead I have a story that I signed an NDA for that is no longer valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box11 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 On 11/04/2024 at 16:36, butlers said: Must remember not send flowers. Court TV coverage was shown on BBC2. Seems fame can buy you an innocent verdict. That’s correct !!!… The way it works is if your fame contributes to the ones in charge they will let you get away with anything and I mean anything !!.. But when you have stopped making money for them they will cut you loose and you will suffer !!!!… It happens to a lot of A lists stars it’s just the way it is…. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box11 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 On 11/04/2024 at 18:11, francypants said: OJ Simpson dead at 76 ............ good ! I believe he should have died in prison. Your right !!!… Cold blooded killer period !!!… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box11 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 On 11/04/2024 at 18:11, francypants said: OJ Simpson dead at 76 ............ good ! I believe he should have died in prison. Your right !!!… Cold blooded killer period !!!… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick666 Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 I've just made this documentary on OJ. He might not have done it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rQx82hBeK0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 On 12/04/2024 at 13:55, geared said: He did loose a second case about the murder though didn't he? A wrongful death civil suit. Lower burden of proof I guess. This (my highlighting in bold) is the crux. If nothing else, his notorious cases show the difference in law (USA but derived from England&Wales) between: a. 'beyond reasonable doubt' [criminal law- OJ not guilty]; and b. 'on the balance of probabilities' [civil law- OJ liable to pay damages]. See it as akin to the mathematical concept of levels of confidence. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now