General Election 2024: General UK Politics Discussion here

[Al Bundy]

Instead of spending more taxpayers' money on more photographers for the sake of his own vanity, the Prime Minister should prioritise feeding the children who will go hungry in half term next week and families facing £1,000 cuts to Universal Credit.

 

Angela Raynor.

[hackey lad]

5 minutes ago, Al Bundy said:

Instead of spending more taxpayers' money on more photographers for the sake of his own vanity, the Prime Minister should prioritise feeding the children who will go hungry in half term next week and families facing £1,000 cuts to Universal Credit.

 

Angela Raynor.

That’s different 

Edited September 23 by hackey lad

[alchresearch]

[Prettytom]

3 hours ago, Prettytom said:

He’s not a woman either. 
 

Smart, assertive, working class women scare the **** out of a certain type of man.

Exhibit A,

 

 

2 hours ago, alchresearch said:

 

 

Is that the Left's new gaslighting strategy this week - "stop picking on Our Ange because she's a strong woman"?

 

Sling mud, get some back on you.

 

 

Scared stiff.

[Prettytom]

3 hours ago, ECCOnoob said:

 

Probably not a lot but it doesn't stop the mouthy mare banging on about it every opportunity does it.  Particularly when she deludedly thinks it helps her politically appeal to the masses or tries to play on it whenever she's been caught out doing something dodgy.

Exhibit B.

 

With a side serving of blatant misogyny.

[Mister M]

51 minutes ago, Al Bundy said:

Again, you are missing the point.

 

Labour proclaim to be the party of the many, not the few, the party of the people.

 

Yet do exactly the same as the conservatives.

 

Only the naive fall for it.

No I'm not missing the point. 

 

The standards that government ministers as judged for example, by the Nolan principles don't differ. 

You're wanting to judge the parties by different standards for your convenience. 

 

 

[Al Bundy]

1 hour ago, Mister M said:

No I'm not missing the point. 

 

The standards that government ministers as judged for example, by the Nolan principles don't differ. 

You're wanting to judge the parties by different standards for your convenience. 

 

 

What on earth have the Nolan's got to do with it?

[alchresearch]

1 hour ago, Prettytom said:

Exhibit A,

 

 

 

Scared stiff.

 

Labour and their shills:

2019: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2020: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2021: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2022: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2023: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2024: Perks are part of the job

 

 

But keep it up - only you and MisterM on here defending Labour, how's that feel!

Edited September 23 by alchresearch

[RJRB]

I voted Labour and would do so again.

However,I am more than disappointed at their naivety on the freeloading issues which have been seized upon by many and detracted from the real issues.

I know that it’s been standard fare for years and by all parties for many years but Starmer made an issue of getting rid of these dubious practices.

How could he fall into such an obvious trap?

[Mister M]

10 minutes ago, alchresearch said:

 

Labour and their shills:

2019: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2020: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2021: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2022: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2023: Crooked Tories and their dodgy donors

2024: Perks are part of the job

 

 

But keep it up - only you and MisterM on here defending Labour, how's that feel!

If you read my earlier post you would've noticed I'm not happy with the freebies they've been receiving.

But seeing as though you ask, the freebies are not on the same scale as dodgy PPE contracts - Anything to say about those?