Attorney General of Kansas Sues Pfizer

[Top4719]

6 hours ago, SheffieldForum said:

Pfizer’s response so far:

 

“The company believes that the state’s case has no merit and will respond to the suit in due course.” 

 

“The representations made by Pfizer about its COVID-19 vaccine have been accurate and science-based.”

 

“Patient safety is our number one priority, which is why we follow diligent safety and monitoring protocols.”

 

Money is their number one priority.

 

Why did they claim the vaccine stopped transmission when it cleary didn't if the "follow diligent safety and monitoring protocols"?

 

[Top4719]

3 hours ago, RJRB said:

Expound

 

I don't need to, you've reproduced a soundbite that hasn't a single thing to back it up.

[BigPP]

7 minutes ago, Top4719 said:

 

Money is their number one priority.

 

Why did they claim the vaccine stopped transmission when it cleary didn't if the "follow diligent safety and monitoring protocols"?

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/preventing-transmission-never-required-covid-vaccines-initial-approval-pfizer-2024-02-12/

 

Fact Check: Preventing transmission never required for COVID vaccines’ initial approval; Pfizer vax did reduce transmission of early variants

[Top4719]

2 minutes ago, BigPP said:

 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/preventing-transmission-never-required-covid-vaccines-initial-approval-pfizer-2024-02-12/

 

Fact Check: Preventing transmission never required for COVID vaccines’ initial approval; Pfizer vax did reduce transmission of early variants

 

Are people still using fact checkers, really 🤣🤣

 

Come on you'll have to do better than that, they admitted in the European Court that it was never intended to stop transmission and it didn't not at all, useless.

[SheffieldForum]

5 minutes ago, Top4719 said:

 

Are people still using fact checkers, really 🤣🤣

 

Yeah, you can prove anything with facts,  can’t you! 🙄

[Top4719]

3 minutes ago, SheffieldForum said:

Yeah, you can prove anything with facts,  can’t you! 🙄

 

So you think these fact checking sites are the bastions of truth do you, really, they're as corrupt as politicians, I'm actually shocked that you haven't sussed that out yet, jeez.

[SheffieldForum]

 

[altus]

24 minutes ago, Top4719 said:

 

Money is their number one priority.

 

Why did they claim the vaccine stopped transmission when it cleary didn't if the "follow diligent safety and monitoring protocols"?

 

 

Did they claim that? Provide your evidence of that. Not a link to someone claiming they said that. Not someone arguing that a claim of reducing transmission[1] is a claim of stopping transmission, but someone from Pfizer claiming their vaccine stopped transmission.

 

[1] It's pretty obvious if something is spread by people sneezing that reducing the amount that people sneeze will reduce the chances of something spreading.

[Top4719]

2 minutes ago, altus said:

 

Did they claim that? Provide your evidence of that. Not a link to someone claiming they said that. Not someone arguing that a claim of reducing transmission[1] is a claim of stopping transmission, but someone from Pfizer claiming their vaccine stopped transmission.

 

[1] It's pretty obvious if something is spread by people sneezing that reducing the amount that people sneeze will reduce the chances of something spreading.

 

It didn't though, not at all, if you think it did your kidding yourself.

[altus]

5 minutes ago, Top4719 said:

 

So you think these fact checking sites are the bastions of truth do you, really, they're as corrupt as politicians, I'm actually shocked that you haven't sussed that out yet, jeez.

 

It's very obvious why people who's claims keep getting debunked by fact checking sites would like to discredit them. Strange how they never actually provide evidence that the fact checking sites have got it wrong though. Just claim they have without anything to back it up.