Julian Assange will not be extradited to the US after reaching plea deal

[Baron99]

On 26/06/2024 at 12:37, Anna B said:

 

Err... that's rather the point.

American war crimes are /were routinely covered up, so no indictments. Assange exposed the war crimes and provided the evidence to match. 

American authorities were outraged. They're supposed to be the good guys in the white hat, they don't want their dirty deeds visible. 

Once again, what war crimes?  The US has plenty of other countries that hate it but despite all this supposed evidence of war crimes being exposed by Assange, not a single other country has decided to even start proceedings against the US in the International Criminal Court. 

 

No indictments because no evidence of any war crimes. 

[ECCOnoob]

On 26/06/2024 at 19:40, Anna B said:

Julian Assange is a reputable Australian Journalist fighting for freedom of speech.

He believes the public has a right to know what is being done in their name. 

 

No. He's a disrupter and antagonist who had had a history of computer hacking since being a teenager with his convictions starting from as early as 1996. 

 

He's a con man constantly playing up his disruptive childhood upbringing and latterly mental disorders to excuse his crimes and seek assistance in from gullible organisations and his even more deluded fan club.

 

He is a blagger who threw information out there without any thought as to the consequences, fact checking or right of reply.  He used the catch all of 'free speech' to try to deludedly justify his actions despite potentially putting people at risk, unjustly ruining reputations and potentially creating great risk to lots of innocent people who were inadvertently named, identified or otherwise connected.

 

His ego and narcissism treated such innocent people with contempt as if they were merely some trivial sacrifice and just the price to be paid in pursuit of his "cause".

 

He's an alleged rapist and complete narcissist who even showed contempt, criminality and total disrespect to the nation's embassy who had kept him safe, secure and housed for seven years at cost of millions of pounds. 

 

Reputable journalist my backside.   

[hackey lad]

2 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

 

No. He's a disrupter and antagonist who had had a history of computer hacking since being a teenager with his convictions starting from as early as 1996. 

 

He's a con man constantly playing up his disruptive childhood upbringing and latterly mental disorders to excuse his crimes and seek assistance in from gullible organisations and his even more deluded fan club.

 

He is a blagger who threw information out there without any thought as to the consequences, fact checking or right of reply.  He used the catch all of 'free speech' to try to deludedly justify his actions despite potentially putting people at risk, unjustly ruining reputations and potentially creating great risk to lots of innocent people who were inadvertently named, identified or otherwise connected.

 

His ego and narcissism treated such innocent people with contempt as if they were merely some trivial sacrifice and just the price to be paid in pursuit of his "cause".

 

He's an alleged rapist and complete narcissist who even showed contempt, criminality and total disrespect to the nation's embassy who had kept him safe, secure and housed for seven years at cost of millions of pounds. 

 

Reputable journalist my backside.   

Bravo