US Presidential Debate.

[m williamson]

1 minute ago, hackey lad said:

What’s his private money got to do with the economy  ? 

 

You see no correlation between someone who doesn't have a reputation of being able to handle his own money with success and being involved in decisions affecting the economy he has an impact on?

If you don't think he could damage it because of his ineptitude as he'd be well advised then the same would apply to Biden, so your comment about trusting either of them with the economy makes no sense, does it?

[trastrick]

1 hour ago, m williamson said:

Neither, but the only reason I wouldn't trust Biden is his age. I wouldn't trust Trump to do any of those, especially drive my grandchildren to school. one of them is a granddaughter and a man who lusts after his own daughter shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a female child.

 

You have a very dirty mind.

 

But no matter, you can relax. He's not going to be moving in to your building, or dating your niece.

 

He has his own flat, a long, long way away!  Lol

 

2 hours ago, m williamson said:

As for running an economy, that clown owes billions and had he put the money his father left him in Fortune 500 companies he'd be a debt free billionaire.

 

With that kind of hindsight, we'd all be $billionaires! 

 

What's in YOUR wallet?  😀

 

2 hours ago, m williamson said:

And have you any idea what isolation means? It means leaving the rest of the world to its own devices

 

If I had to make a guess, it would be someone like you.

 

With no sense of a real world out there

[m williamson]

2 hours ago, The_DADDY said:

I can bedate sure. But what's the point of debating with someone who starts off with "No one can dispute that Trump is one of the most objectionable people to have ever reached the position he has"

 

I'm happy to give your future posts a swerve if that's what you wish.

No hard feelings on my part 👍

 

Right,  I was somewhat pressed for time earlier having a life other than this forum, but let's debate this point a little further shall we?

 

You objected to the comment " No one can dispute that Trump is one of the most objectionable people to have ever reached the position he has ".

 

In which case you obviously believe that he isn't one of the most objectionable of the 46 American Presidents? So in that case you will be able to provide us with a list of those that were more objectionable than the racist, misogynist, lying, insulter of veterans, insulter of an American war hero, insulter of a disabled man, and who's been convicted of rape, and is someone who pleaded the fifth amendment 97 times to avoid admitting to adultery in a divorce case, won't you?

 

Because unless you can do that, then the fact is no can dispute that he is One of the most objectionable people to have ever reached the position he has, can they?

 

[m williamson]

20 minutes ago, trastrick said:

 

You have a very dirty mind.

 

But no matter, you can relax. He's not going to be moving in to your building, or dating your niece.

 

He has his own flat, a long, long way away!  Lol

 

 

With that kind of hindsight, we'd all be $billionaires! 

 

What's in YOUR wallet?  😀

 

 

If I had to make a guess, it would be someone like you.

 

With no sense of a real world out there

 

Have you ever considered actually attempting to provide anything to a thread other than smartarse remarks or emojis?

[hackey lad]

1 hour ago, m williamson said:

 

You see no correlation between someone who doesn't have a reputation of being able to handle his own money with success and being involved in decisions affecting the economy he has an impact on?

If you don't think he could damage it because of his ineptitude as he'd be well advised then the same would apply to Biden, so your comment about trusting either of them with the economy makes no sense, does it?

“ involved in decisions “ . Do you believe he could wake up one morning and make decisions on his own that affect a nation? 

[hackey lad]

I never said I don’t trust either of them . 

[The_DADDY]

1 hour ago, m williamson said:

 

Right,  I was somewhat pressed for time earlier having a life other than this forum, but let's debate this point a little further shall we?

 

You objected to the comment " No one can dispute that Trump is one of the most objectionable people to have ever reached the position he has ".

 

In which case you obviously believe that he isn't one of the most objectionable of the 46 American Presidents? So in that case you will be able to provide us with a list of those that were more objectionable than the racist, misogynist, lying, insulter of veterans, insulter of an American war hero, insulter of a disabled man, and who's been convicted of rape, and is someone who pleaded the fifth amendment 97 times to avoid admitting to adultery in a divorce case, won't you?

 

Because unless you can do that, then the fact is no can dispute that he is One of the most objectionable people to have ever reached the position he has, can they?

 

Feel better?

Oh, by the way. My apologies for not replying sooner only I have a life outside of this forum 🙄

[The_DADDY]

1 hour ago, m williamson said:

 

Have you ever considered actually attempting to provide anything to a thread other than smartarse remarks or emojis?

My bold

🤣 You are one to talk. 🤣

[The_DADDY]

Yep. Bidens getting replaced  

When msm turns on you you know it's over 

 

 

 

[trastrick]

5 hours ago, m williamson said:

 

Have you ever considered actually attempting to provide anything to a thread other than smartarse remarks or emojis?

 

I do it all the time.

 

For all those who bought the "narrative" over the last 7 years, from a totally corrupt Leftist Administration, and their totally corrupt propaganda arm, the MSM Censorship Industrial Complex.

 

The ones who accuse the proud Party of Abraham Lincoln, who freed the slaves, of Eisenhower, who led the Allied WW2 victory over Hitler and his Fascist white supremacists, and presided over the victory of South Korea against the Communist invasion, of Reagan who ended the Iran Hostage Crisis on day 1 of his Administration and  who "colluded" with the Russian Gorbachev to end the Cold War, of Bush Sr. who Presided over the fall of the Communists Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, and defeated the million strong Saddam Hussein Army of Kuwait Invaders in a little over a day, with virtually no U.S. Casualties,  and of Trump, who ended the ISIS Caliphate, and negotiated the Abraham Accords in the Middle East, and presided over relative peace, with no new wars,  of being a "Threat to Democracy".

 

As to the contrived and fabricated allegations of Trump's lawbreaking, by Democrat AG hacks for hire, like Bragg, James, and Fanni and lover. any Judgements issued so far,  are under Appeal, and their cases are falling apart faster than a pair of Bunny's cheap wool gloves in a snowball fight.

 

The rocks have been lifted by the Republicans, and the cockroaches are scurrying around in a panic! Biden is done in one day!

 

More to come, and it's going to be come uppance time for a lot of these charlatans.

 

The MSM are already running for the exits.

 

(Can you believe, with all their "investigations" and "fact checkers", they only found out that Biden, wasn't "sharp as a tack" on Thursday? 😀)

 

As for their dupes, they are left abandoned and will die clinging to their conspiracy theories and failed hoaxes. A pox on their houses!

 

 In their world, Donald Trump is still on his way to jail. In the real world, he's on his way to the White House  (place appropriate emoji here)  😀

 

Now it's time to make Peace, not War, Love, not Hate, Unity, not Division, and a return from mass indoctrination, to common sense!

 

Here's the latest from a couple of days ago:

 

Supreme Court casts doubt on hundreds of Jan 6 cases

BBC

https://www.bbc.com › news › articles

1 day ago — The justices ruled that obstruction charges must include proof that defendants tried to tamper with or destroy documents. More than 350 people ...

 

What's next for the Jan. 6 riot probe after Supreme Court ...

The Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com › ... › Legal Issues

1 day ago — Will charges against Trump survive? Will the vast majority of Jan. 6 convictions stand? Was the Justice Dept. prosecution of the Capitol breach ...

 

Trump is the true winner in the decision on Fani Willis ...

The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › mar › fani-wi...

Mar 15, 2024 — The Fulton county district attorney can now continue prosecuting her case against Trump and 14 co-defendants as long as Nathan Wade, a top ...

 

The Bragg Case Against Trump Is a Historic Mistake

The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com › 2024/04/23 › opinion › bra...

Apr 23, 2024 — To recap: Mr. Trump is accused in the case of falsifying business records. Those are misdemeanor charges. To elevate it to a criminal case, Mr....

 

Letitia James Sacrifices the Rule of Law to Get Trump

WSJ

https://www.wsj.com › Opinion › Life Science

Mar 3, 2024 — The state trial judge, Arthur Engoron, ruled on Feb. 16 that Mr. Trump's false financial statements, no matter whether they harmed anyone, ...

 

Is it time for Jack Smith to throw in the towel on prosecuting Trump...

The Hill

https://thehill.com › opinion › judiciary › 4505531-is-it...

Mar 4, 2024 — ... Jack Smith's timetable, it seems more likely than not that there will be no trial of Donald Trump in a federal court before the election.