The_DADDY Posted August 8 Author Share Posted August 8 1 minute ago, Prettytom said: Snipped If you use a service, you abide by the t&cs applicable at the time. Snipped As I did. When I joined Facebook and Twitter there was no requirement to supply id. Should they be allowed to suddenly change it? Well of course. It's their company so they can do as they wish. I can do the same, if the try to force the requirement on me I'll simply leave. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettytom Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 Just now, The_DADDY said: As I did. When I joined Facebook and Twitter there was no requirement to supply id. Should they be allowed to suddenly change it? Well of course. It's their company so they can do as they wish. I can do the same, if the try to force the requirement on me I'll simply leave. I’ve left Twitter because it isn’t properly regulated. You stick around if you like, because it’s a free country. It’s broken though. Properly broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted August 8 Author Share Posted August 8 Just now, Prettytom said: I’ve left Twitter because it isn’t properly regulated. You stick around if you like, because it’s a free country. It’s broken though. Properly broken. I disagree. It's been broken for years. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettytom Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 1 minute ago, The_DADDY said: I disagree. It's been broken for years. Yes, but I was talking about Twitter😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted August 8 Author Share Posted August 8 (edited) 1 minute ago, Prettytom said: Yes, but I was talking about Twitter😁 So was I. Sorry, my bad. It's been a crap day so I'm not quite with it. Yes, very funny 😁 Edited August 8 by The_DADDY 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 25 minutes ago, Jim Hardie said: So should we expect Cllr Jones to be fast-tracked into jail next week? Of course . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted August 8 Author Share Posted August 8 19 minutes ago, hackey lad said: Of course . He needs a good sentencing 👍 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 1 hour ago, The_DADDY said: He needs a good sentencing 👍 I think I’ve seen his face on the news before. I don’t think it’s the first time he caused controversy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peak4 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 2 hours ago, Jim Hardie said: So should we expect Cllr Jones to be fast-tracked into jail next week? No, like anyone else who has promoted violence, as certainly seems to be the case with his dangerous and odious rhetoric, he should be fast-tracked to court; I gather he has already been arrested. That court should decide his fate according to the law, and which charges The CPS advocate. If he pleads guilty, which on the face of it would seem his best option, then sent directly to gaol seems fair if a custodial sentence if felt appropriate. He may well be sent direct to a gaol for a period as per the magistrates sentencing, or on remand to await a Crown Court date for trial (or sentencing) if the magistrates don't feel they can offer a long enough gaol term. Labour rightly immediately suspended him, and should throw him out if found or pleads guilty.; they have their own disciplinary rules to which they need to adhere. Lets not have any loopholes which the guilty can seek to exploit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 3 minutes ago, peak4 said: No, like anyone else who has promoted violence, as certainly seems to be the case with his dangerous and odious rhetoric, he should be fast-tracked to court; I gather he has already been arrested. That court should decide his fate according to the law, and which charges The CPS advocate. If he pleads guilty, which on the face of it would seem his best option, then sent directly to gaol seems fair if a custodial sentence if felt appropriate. He may well be sent direct to a gaol for a period as per the magistrates sentencing, or on remand to await a Crown Court date for trial (or sentencing) if the magistrates don't feel they can offer a long enough gaol term. Labour rightly immediately suspended him, and should throw him out if found or pleads guilty.; they have their own disciplinary rules to which they need to adhere. Lets not have any loopholes which the guilty can seek to exploit. Should throw him out if he is found or pleads guilty . Lord almighty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now