redruby Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 32 minutes ago, RollingJ said: Below is the post I was referring to And in part (the first sentence) it is correct. The 'stereotyping' comment, however, is totally wrong and an invention. We are going round in circles now. I’m not stating the obvious yet again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 Just now, redruby said: We are going round in circles now. I’m not stating the obvious yet again. Does that mean I can finally ignore most of your posts from now on ? - good. (Apologies for getting personal @SheffieldForum, but...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 looks like youve all gone off topic as usual, ive gone back 3 pages cant be arsed to go back anymore if i missed it im sorry. After the Labour Councillor appearing and being remanded A wife of a Tory Councillors appeared in court and remanded charged with hate offences online. she told people to burn where they live, with them in it for all they care. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm23y9ggz33o people really need to watch their mouths with the hate 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 18 minutes ago, melthebell said: looks like youve all gone off topic as usual, ive gone back 3 pages cant be arsed to go back anymore if i missed it im sorry. After the Labour Councillor appearing and being remanded A wife of a Tory Councillors appeared in court and remanded charged with hate offences online. she told people to burn where they live, with them in it for all they care. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm23y9ggz33o people really need to watch their mouths with the hate That 'lady' shouldn't be a child-minder -obviously she has never grown up. What's with physical description lines in the report though - they are a total irrelevance.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 4 hours ago, redruby said: its deprivation that causes much crime, not skin colour. So rich people don't commit crime, that a new one on me. Rich people are more likely to commit fraud, perhaps, but not riot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 1 minute ago, RollingJ said: That 'lady' shouldn't be a child-minder -obviously she has never grown up. What's with physical description lines in the report though - they are a total irrelevance.? I've noticed reporters do that, they give a brief description of the physical appearance of the defendant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 Just now, Mister M said: I've noticed reporters do that, they give a brief description of the physical appearance of the defendant Why? It not relevant to the alleged offence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 Just now, RollingJ said: Why? It not relevant to the alleged offence. Don't know, it's something I've noticed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 7 minutes ago, RollingJ said: That 'lady' shouldn't be a child-minder -obviously she has never grown up. What's with physical description lines in the report though - they are a total irrelevance.? no idea, im not a reporter, at a guess would it be similiar to the drawings they used to make of people in court? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 (edited) 7 minutes ago, melthebell said: no idea, im not a reporter, at a guess would it be similiar to the drawings they used to make of people in court? I'm not a reporter either, but at the risk of once again taking this off-topic I don't quite see your analogy. The reasons for the drawings of defendants in court is due to the 'no cameras' rule. The defendants in court, theoretically, are fair game - although I disagree with that - but physically describing someone who has merely been charged...? Edited August 10 by RollingJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now