Demonstrations, Riots and Disorder Across the UK Following the Southport Attacks

[Draggletail]

7 minutes ago, lavery549@yahoo said:

Love that word , reminds of Les Dawson as Cosmo Smallpiece 😅

I used to say ******** a lot in everyday language years ago, and the woman that eventually became my wife picked up on it and started saying it, but in such a soft way. I don't know how anyone could say ******** so poetically.   ❤️

[Guest]

The Humber sesh

[peak4]

26 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said:

Are you for real?? just in London for example, our capital city, when you aggregate together all the various non white groups, collectively they outnumber whites. This is common knowledge. 

Many folk find it advantageous to provide a verifiable source when making such claims
All sorts of info available HERE;

[Mister M]

1 hour ago, hackey lad said:

Can she be prosecuted ? 

Good question....

The answer is I don't know.

54 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said:

It's Tom Witherow that should be prosecuted if anything nasty happens to this woman as a direct result of his doxxing of her.

 

What he chooses to put his energy into and what he chooses not to says a lot about the dick head.

Legitimate journalism is legal and necessary in a democracy.

Misinformation from some potential stirrer on social media is anathema to democracy.

[peak4]

54 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said:

It's Tom Witherow that should be prosecuted if anything nasty happens to this woman as a direct result of his doxxing of her.

What he chooses to put his energy into and what he chooses not to says a lot about the dick head.

If you read the article, he didn't identify her; the only thing he might have got wrong, is that he claims she deleted her account, whereas it looks like she's just protected it, so only approved followers can view her bile.

From the Times article
The woman, who The Times is not naming, is a prominent campaigner against lockdowns and net-zero climate schemes.

She had tens of thousands of followers before she deleted her account.

[hackey lad]

11 minutes ago, Mister M said:

Good question....

The answer is I don't know.

Legitimate journalism is legal and necessary in a democracy.

Misinformation from some potential stirrer on social media is anathema to democracy.

"anathema" . Good word 

[Mister M]

8 minutes ago, peak4 said:

If you read the article, he didn't identify her; the only thing he might have got wrong, is that he claims she deleted her account, whereas it looks like she's just protected it, so only approved followers can view her bile.

From the Times article
The woman, who The Times is not naming, is a prominent campaigner against lockdowns and net-zero climate schemes.

She had tens of thousands of followers before she deleted her account.

It is interesting how some people of a certain mindset buzz round certain issues - she probably thinks she's being trendy being a libertarian

[Mister M]

2 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said:

That shows whites are 53% of London. Bare in mind that is from 2021 and that statistic is bound to have changed by now to less than 50%

So what are you going to do about it?

[hackey lad]

7 minutes ago, Mister M said:

So what are you going to do about it?

Go rioting and looting  ?

[peak4]

10 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said:

That shows whites are 53% of London. Bare in mind that is from 2021 and that statistic is bound to have changed by now to less than 50%

At least now the discussion is completely out in the open; this is purely about skin colour not nationality. 
Is anyone here seriously suggesting that someone with darker skin is any less British, than a person with a pale complexion, even though their predecessors may have lived here for generations?
What is the qualification for Britishness in your eyes?
This is from the ONS where you can build your own data tables, to show that ~73% Londoners are British, more if you count dual nationalities.