RollingJ Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Do you not think that the ability to bring modified for the purpose drugs, if urgently required, is not a good thing, born of the experience these concerns have amassed over the years, combined with the increased use of technology? Brand new drugs still cost more than a couple of quid to research and develop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aardvark6535 Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 1 minute ago, RollingJ said: Do you not think that the ability to bring modified for the purpose drugs, if urgently required, is not a good thing, born of the experience these concerns have amassed over the years, combined with the increased use of technology? Brand new drugs still cost more than a couple of quid to research and develop. I'm all for targeted jabs, or I would be if they work, It sounds possible, but they would have to have better results than their previous try. Second thoughts on the profitability of Jab, Kids are an easy target for jabs and for companies and Doctors to make another few Quid, Why do you think Kids have all these Jabs, something like 40 or 50 before the age of 18. Not individual jabs, like the MMR jab, there are some that contain 5 injections in One shot. (and u wonder why ADHD etc are on the rise) I can guarantee if there was no profit there would be no Jabs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 2 minutes ago, aardvark6535 said: I can guarantee if there was no profit there would be no Jabs. And a hell lot more of easily preventable diseases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfifes Posted August 17 Author Share Posted August 17 51 minutes ago, Prettytom said: That is exactly what he isn’t. Coleman isn’t a medical professional at all. Maybe you meant “a real, violent, conspiracy theorist and self publicist “ He has qualified as a doctor (albeit retired now). Unlike some so called “experts” commenting on medical matters. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aardvark6535 Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 6 minutes ago, pfifes said: He has qualified as a doctor (albeit retired now). Unlike some so called “experts” commenting on medical matters. The good Doctor on ITV in 1981 defending his patients right to confidentiality - 2.07 This shows exactly how much he thinks of his Patients, and of his oath. A young Dr. Vernon Coleman on ITV regional news - July 1981 - Onevsp.mp4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettytom Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 14 minutes ago, pfifes said: He has qualified as a doctor (albeit retired now). Unlike some so called “experts” commenting on medical matters. He hasn’t retired. He’s relinquished his status as a doctor. That’s different. There are plenty of well established, serious ways to challenge scientific orthodoxy. Posting drivel on YouTube isn’t one of those routes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfifes Posted August 17 Author Share Posted August 17 5 minutes ago, Prettytom said: He hasn’t retired. He’s relinquished his status as a doctor. That’s different. There are plenty of well established, serious ways to challenge scientific orthodoxy. Posting drivel on YouTube isn’t one of those routes. He has still qualified as a doctor unlike other “experts” commenting on medical matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Just now, pfifes said: He has still qualified as a doctor unlike other “experts” commenting on medical matters. As he has relinquished his status as a doctor, why is he still titling himself 'Dr' Vernon Coleman - he has no right to that designation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfifes Posted August 17 Author Share Posted August 17 7 minutes ago, RollingJ said: As he has relinquished his status as a doctor, why is he still titling himself 'Dr' Vernon Coleman - he has no right to that designation? But he still qualified as a medical doctor. Most of self appointed “experts” on monkeypox and COVID 19 have had zero medical training. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 1 minute ago, pfifes said: But he still qualified as a medical doctor. Most of self appointed “experts” on monkeypox and COVID 19 have had zero medical training. He may have qualified as a doctor, but as said, he relinquished his his status, therefore his use of the prefix is at best disingenuous, at worst fraud. Are all these other people calling themselves 'Doctor', bearing in mind that a lot of them are qualified in other areas, but still with relevant knowledge/experience? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now