Baron99 Posted Saturday at 09:07 Share Posted Saturday at 09:07 Sheffield councillors are calling for an end to the 'Right to Buy' scheme. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c981g8y27z8o I think it makes sense not taking properties out of local authority ownership when people are trying to find a home. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassett one Posted Saturday at 11:24 Share Posted Saturday at 11:24 the idea was great back in the 70s, with the idea of wealth for familys for the future, but many with big familys sold there inheritence fast as many needed the cash, then many landlords bought them ending in them being rented out at a much higher rent than many could afford, but also part of the idea was to put the sale of these houses ect back into the pot and build new houses, this of course did not happen and then SCC pulled down many propertys in the boom time ,thus causing a dramatic housing shortage, plus people cannot get on the buying houses ladder due to low wages ect, plus lack of building causing huge shortages, we need building on the scale of the 1950s and more bungalows for our ageing population, this would get older people to give up there council house, as going into a flat has 2 problems one being stairs, second mixing with noisy younger people, so build more inc bungalows is the answer and put back the sale of the houses ect money and maybe make a rule that you can only buy after say 10-15 years of renting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpist Posted yesterday at 05:49 Share Posted yesterday at 05:49 18 hours ago, bassett one said: the idea was great back in the 70s, with the idea of wealth for familys for the future, but many with big familys sold there inheritence fast as many needed the cash, then many landlords bought them ending in them being rented out at a much higher rent than many could afford, but also part of the idea was to put the sale of these houses ect back into the pot and build new houses, this of course did not happen and then SCC pulled down many propertys in the boom time ,thus causing a dramatic housing shortage, plus people cannot get on the buying houses ladder due to low wages ect, plus lack of building causing huge shortages, we need building on the scale of the 1950s and more bungalows for our ageing population, this would get older people to give up there council house, as going into a flat has 2 problems one being stairs, second mixing with noisy younger people, so build more inc bungalows is the answer and put back the sale of the houses ect money and maybe make a rule that you can only buy after say 10-15 years of renting. " but also part of the idea was to put the sale of these houses ect back into the pot and build new houses, this of course did not happen a" I beleive that councils were not allowed to use the cash generated to build new homes by order of the Thatcher government Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassett one Posted yesterday at 15:53 Share Posted yesterday at 15:53 plus pulling down instead of re-furbing houses in the early 2000s thus caused a shortage we need houses urgent, pity they cannot do a rent/buy scheme say 1st 10 years then you take over and buy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abbeyedges Posted yesterday at 16:40 Share Posted yesterday at 16:40 Everytime a council house was sold another one should have been built. The council estates of the 1950's / 1960's were ideal for young families just starting out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted yesterday at 18:09 Share Posted yesterday at 18:09 On 28/09/2024 at 10:07, Baron99 said: Sheffield councillors are calling for an end to the 'Right to Buy' scheme. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c981g8y27z8o I think it makes sense not taking properties out of local authority ownership when people are trying to find a home. 1. SCC cannot opt-out of it It's a statutory scheme, now in Part V of the Housing Act 1985. 2. Whether a property remains owned by a Council or is sold makes no difference at all to the quantity of properties- it's used for housing someone no matter whether a tenant placed there by the Council or a BTL owner's tenant. 3. What's really problematic, however, is if the tenant who purchases later resells once the discount is no longer repayable. RTB sales were not intended to be a self-enrichment facility at public cost. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stannington Lad Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago Yep, needs ditching as does buy to let 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stannington Lad Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 2 hours ago, abbeyedges said: Everytime a council house was sold another one should have been built. The council estates of the 1950's / 1960's were ideal for young families just starting out. Was never going to happen, the Tories genuinely believe social housing create Labour voters Tories refused to build new social housing because of 'Labour voter fears' | Metro News The Tories have always feared social housing – and now their actions speak louder than words | The Independent | The Independent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron99 Posted 14 hours ago Author Share Posted 14 hours ago 9 hours ago, Stannington Lad said: Was never going to happen, the Tories genuinely believe social housing create Labour voters Tories refused to build new social housing because of 'Labour voter fears' | Metro News The Tories have always feared social housing – and now their actions speak louder than words | The Independent | The Independent My bold. If that was the case, it makes you wonder why during the 13 years of the Blair / Brown administration, they never attempted to change the policy? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Right to buy policy was riddled with poor legislation. Chiefly, what was missing was when the buyer wanted to sell/rent the house. There should have been a covenant within the sale contract. It should have been that if the owner wished to sell it, only the council could by it, with the same discount applied as it was when it was sold to the RTB tenant. If the RTB tenant wished to rent it then ONLY a social housing tenant could be placed into it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now