scottf Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 I don't know the stats to be prefectly honest- i bet some anal person could tell us though. thats only 6 players at chelsea and not everyone of those are guaranteed to be injury free! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie Loving Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 I don't know the stats to be prefectly honest- i bet some anal person could tell us though. thats only 6 players at chelsea and not everyone of those are guaranteed to be injury free! still looks more promising for chelsea, surely you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blade1983 Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 I agree- thats a reasonable limit and it would give all clubs chance to develop there young players- who knows where people like forte and sharp could be given there chance in the first teams! Forte is CR@P (full stop). Billy Sharp is excellent - that was one hell of a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottf Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 still looks more promising for chelsea, surely you agree? no, i think that overall the manchester united players are better as a team, as indivuals then no- chelsea have a better team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottf Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 Forte is CR@P (full stop). Billy Sharp is excellent - that was one hell of a mistake. how can you tell- forte has only had a few substitute appearances, by all accounts he has played well at the clubs he is on loan to and he is still learning!!!! sharp? well- time will tell!!! But these kind of players would have been given a chance in the first team if we limited the amount of foriegn players that can be in your starting VI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie Loving Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 But these kind of players would have been given a chance in the first team if we limited the amount of foriegn players that can be in your starting VI. doubt it, the players that have been in front of them in the past have been majorly english Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottf Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 doubt it, the players that have been in front of them in the past have been majorly english thats why i said these KIND of players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norton Posted October 13, 2006 Author Share Posted October 13, 2006 Billy Sharp is excellent - that was one hell of a mistake. When will people get over Billy Sharp? He is playing at his level for now. He wanted first team football, he did not want a loan. Sheffield United couldn't give him first team football and last season's promotion shows that the team selection was justified. So we sold him. He is doing well and good luck to him, but a Premiership player he certainly was not whilst playing in the Blades reserves and youth teams. The people who hark on about this youngsters are often ones who never actually can be bothered to go and see them play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidRa Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 When will people get over Billy Sharp? He is playing at his level for now. He wanted first team football, he did not want a loan. Sheffield United couldn't give him first team football and last season's promotion shows that the team selection was justified. So we sold him. He is doing well and good luck to him, but a Premiership player he certainly was not whilst playing in the Blades reserves and youth teams. The people who hark on about this youngsters are often ones who never actually can be bothered to go and see them play. Agree many ex united strikers can score in the lower leagues,he obviously as an eye for goal and good technique,he does not have great pace ,I am not saying he is slow ,and he is small by modern standards,he is still young and may make it say in the Championship,Premiership I would doubt it,having said that only 5 or 6 of the current squad are Premiership class Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidRa Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 ha ha, well that is 5 players who all play in first team for chelsea. realisitc english players manure..... neville (few years left) foster (possibly) ferdinand (yes) brown (yes) carrick (decent but overpriced) scholes (old) richardson (not top class) rooney (class) smith (never convinced over last few years) chelsea terry (excellent) A cole (great defender) bridge (great defender) lampard (quality) J Cole (quality) SWP (not a fan but i know he is good) i think i prefer chelsea english men to be honest. i know arsenal have fielded an all foreign side, but wasnt it about 5 years since chelsea did it? Disagree Ashley Cole must be one of the most overated players,I think Gallas is a much better player.Cole is quick and is a decent player, but already looks past his best. What do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.