Jump to content

Well Done That Man, Pensioner Tackles Four Muggers


Recommended Posts

You are missing the point, he committed an aggressive act which could be contrieved as going over the top in belting out at the four muggers. Forget his age this as nothing to do with it and is only there to sell newspapers. The point is he has got away with it this time.

 

Hardly. He committed an act of self defence. He was going about his business when he was set upon. With the first kid, he did everything he could to stop his attacker, he didn't go over the top. As for the other, he stopped the attacker from kicking him in the head. Seems like reasonable force to me. Would you say the same if it was your granddad?

 

Hat off to the lad :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are missing the point, he committed an aggressive act which could be contrieved as going over the top in belting out at the four muggers. Forget his age this as nothing to do with it and is only there to sell newspapers. The point is he has got away with it this time.

 

Reading the article it's self-defence and he used reasonable force to stop them.

 

What do you think constitutes self-defence? Please enlighten us, or are you in support of the muggers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are missing the point, he committed an aggressive act which could be contrieved as going over the top in belting out at the four muggers. Forget his age this as nothing to do with it and is only there to sell newspapers. The point is he has got away with it this time.

 

Until you can provide evidence that that was the outcome of this story from 2006, i'll assume that nothing further happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
I am afraid your knowledge of the law is limited. The CPC have enough evidence here to make a case in favour of the four muggers and take legal action against this man regardless of his age which is irrelevant by the way.

 

Okay, you legal know it all. If the soldier got into trouble for defending himself, then perhaps he should habd his poissessions over and then wouldn't bhave to fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you are missing the point, he committed an aggressive act which could be contrieved as going over the top in belting out at the four muggers. Forget his age this as nothing to do with it and is only there to sell newspapers. The point is he has got away with it this time.

rubbish...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.