Rotherhamer Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 This post does not even rate a reply. why its a perfectly reasonable question to try and explain morally guilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikita Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Please explain what you regard as morally guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotherhamer Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Please explain what you regard as morally guilty. If it can never be proved that you commited a crime,but actually did do it you are legally innocent but morally guilty,I would have thought that was very easy to understand:huh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikita Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 So who are you to judge kate and gerry morally guilty do you know something the rest of us dont.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angle20 Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 That is untrue. From the very first day some people were very critical and prepared to aportion at least some of the blame on the McCanns, and it has continued throughout. It is the case that were critical comments from the beginning about the wisdom or morality of leaving children in a hotel bedroom on their own. As an aside, the McCanns can't have been the first (or last) parents to do this: it's a judgement around the number and ages of the children, whether there are any health or behavioural problems, and how long and far way the parents will be. The point I was making, however, was about sympathy in terms of accepting the scenario of an abduction - as opposed to the later emergence of a suspicion that the parents may have been suggesting things which are not true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotherhamer Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 So who are you to judge kate and gerry morally guilty do you know something the rest of us dont.? Cant you read? at the beginning and end of the post i stated it was an hypothetical scenario Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikita Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Oh really sorry .Cant see point of them my self but there you go. Sorry again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotherhamer Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Oh really sorry .Cant see point of them my self but there you go. Sorry again Kate and Gerry!..know them personally do you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikita Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Sorry again i thought that was their names . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotherhamer Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 I think a lot of the problems with the arguments on here is because people,especially women cant believe that a mother would do anything to harm her own children,its completley against a mothers natural instincts,and when anything happens to suggest otherwise their natural instinct is to defend the mother,sadly it does happen. Now I dont profess to know what happened that night in Portugal and to be perfectly honest I dont think anybody ever will,this case will die a death simply for the lack of proof,if the McCanns are guilty of any involvement they have to live with that,in that respect they are going to be have be mentally strong for the rest of their lives. I personally think,along with hundreds of other people,that they know more about the girls disappearance than they are admitting,that is my view and I am entitled to it.As far as Im concerned the only way I will change that view is if somebody other than the McCanns actually either admits something or it is proven in a court of law that another person/persons was involved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.