bladesgirl Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 hi superblade i have just read at the bottom of sky sports news that hes available after the loan spell at Preston........ but i went onto the sky sports website and yes he did play for Preston against West Brom in FA cup....... eh?? is there another rule or is everyone getting it wrong about Kozzy playing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobsyouruncle Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 just to clear something up for you regarding Kozluk...... "A player recalled, at any time prior to the date of the Round, to his original Club from temporary (loan) transfer, in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement, may represent his original Club. Such player may only play in postponed and replayed matches if he had been recalled in time for the first match." taken fron the FA Rule Book. so therefore, he is eligble for selection for todays game as it is a replay, but WILL NOT be allowed to play when they get Arsenal in the next round. (unless this game is postponed or goes to a replay again) OK!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuPeRbLaDe Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 but he wasnt recalled before the 1st match, infact he wasnt recalled at all his loan just expired, so can he play or not? how confusing is this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobsyouruncle Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 HMMMM. the fa doesnt say, so if presuming his loan period expired AFTER the first W.Ham game was played, would he still be eligible for todays game? (having not been recalled) according to utd's oficial site, he's still on loan to preston!! :huh::huh: we will soon find out!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duffman Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Don't take what the web site says they are slow to amend the squad list. Kozzy's loan expired after the first game with west ham and Luke Becketts expires today so they are both available for the game. Not long now, C'mon you Blades!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuPeRbLaDe Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 if he is played though and isnt allowed we could suffer a hefty fine + being banned from next years competition. i dont think its worth it personally unless were sure of the rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirky Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Originally posted by tosh13 Warnock going for Craig Short at Blackburn,he said he is not up to the training to compete in the premiere league,yes we will have the old & crocked players,maybe his experience might help Cullip & Morgan.we live in hope.UP THE BLADES didn't he play for us before or was that his brother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duffman Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Has it happend before or am I thinking of a rugby league team that fielded a player who was not available to play this year? Anyway I don't think the Blades would make such a mistake, it's worth too much money for them and heads would roll if it did, plus although it shores up the numbers we don't really need these players in the squad today anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duffman Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Originally posted by kirky didn't he play for us before or was that his brother? wasn't it Chris Short who played for us? I'm not too sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobsyouruncle Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 2 brilliant saves, 2 crap misses, bring on the arsenal. payback time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.